Cited by 29Cultural Competency in Health CareMental Health and PsychiatryMigration, Health and Trauma

The DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview: Bridging Barriers Toward a Clinically Integrated Cultural Assessment in Psychiatry

DeSilva, Ravi, Aggarwal, Neil Krishan, Lewis-Fernández, Roberto·2018·Psychiatric Annals

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , fifth edition, (DSM-5) Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) is a systematic, semi-structured interview developed to guide clinicians on conducting a cultural assessment in routine mental health settings. An international field trial with 318 patients, 75 clinicians, and 86 family members in 6 countries found the core version of the CFI to be feasible, acceptable, and clinically useful, and a growing evidence base has led to its inclusion in worldwide mental health services. We review the definition of culture that underlies the CFI, its development and components, and how to apply it in care. We also focus on barriers to its implementation and how these are being addressed by investigators and clinicians. The cultural formulation approach stemming from DSM-IV , of which the DSM-5 CFI is the latest iteration, constitutes the cultural competence paradigm with the largest evidence base in mental health service delivery. [ Psychiatr Ann. 2018;48(3):154–159.]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/00485713-20180214-01

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct assessment of the potential effects of the CFI on communication, engagement, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment participation is only now under way.

    “However, direct assessment of these potential effects is only now under way (11).”

    From Update on the Cultural Formulation Interview (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 29

Authors
DeSilva, R., Aggarwal, N. K., & Lewis-Fernández, R.
Venue
Psychiatric Annals
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2018-03
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
154-159
ISSN
  • 0048-5713 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2456
OpenAlex
W2791455482
Cited by
29
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychiatric Annals (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
Cultural Formulation Interview, DSM-5, cultural assessment, cultural competence, psychiatric diagnosis, cross-cultural psychiatry, implementation barriers, definition of culture, mental health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review