Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 473

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects

Minas, Tom, Nehrer, Stefan·1997·Orthopedics

Abstract

Over time, articular cartilage loses the capacity to regenerate itself, making repair of articular surfaces difficult. Lavage and debridement may offer temporary relief of pain for up to 4.5 years, but offer no prospect of long-term cure. Likewise, marrow-stimulation techniques such as drilling, microfracture, or abrasion arthroplasty fail to yield long-term solutions because they typically promote the development of fibrocartilage. Fibrocartilage lacks the durability and many of the mechanical properties of the hyaline cartilage that normally covers articular surfaces. Repair tissue resembling hyaline cartilage can be induced to fill in articular defects by using perichondrial and periosteal grafts. However, these techniques are limited by the amount of tissue available for grafting and the tendency toward ossification of the repair tissue. Autogenous osteochondral arthroscopically implanted grafts (mosaicplasty), or open implantation of lateral patellar facet (Outerbridge technique), requires violation of subchondral bone. Osteochondral allografts risk viral transmission of disease and low chondrocyte viability, in addition to removal of host bone for implantation. Autologous chondrocyte implantation offers the opportunity to achieve biologic repair, enabling the surgeon to repair the joint surface with autologous articular cartilage. With this technique, care must be taken to ensure the safety, viability, and microbial integrity of the autologous cells while they are expanded in culture over a 4- to 5-week period prior to implantation. Surgical implantation requires equal attention to meticulous technique. In the future, physiologic repair also may become possible using mesenchymal stem cells or chondrocytes delivered surgically in an ex vivo-derived matrix. This would allow in vitro manipulation of cells with growth factors, mechanical stimuli, and matrix sizing to allow implantation of mature biosynthetic grafts which would allow treatment of larger defects with decreased rehabilitation and morbidity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/0147-7447-19970601-08

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 473

Metadata

Authors
Minas, T., & Nehrer, S.
Venue
Orthopedics
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
1997-06
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
525-538
ISSN
  • 0147-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2367
OpenAlex
W141802151
Cited by
473
References
0
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Concepts in the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3928/0147-7447-19970601-08
The paper
Minas, T., & Nehrer, S. (1997). Current Concepts in the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects. Orthopedics. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19970601-08

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.