Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 590

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Descemet's Stripping With Endothelial Keratoplasty in 50 Eyes: A Refractive Neutral Corneal Transplant

Price, Francis W, Price, Marianne O·2005·Journal of Refractive Surgery

Abstract

ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To evaluate early visual and refractive outcomes following treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction with a corneal transplantation technique, Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). METHODS: Visual and refractive outcomes of the first 50 consecutive cases of DSEK performed by a single surgeon between December 2003 and July 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. The DSEK technique consisted of stripping Descemet's membrane and endothelium from a recipient cornea and transplanting the posterior stroma and endothelium of a donor cornea through a 5-mm incision. RESULTS: Results are reported for 50 eyes in 47 patients (30 women and 17 men). Mean patient age at surgery was 70±12 years (range: 34 to 89 years). Five eyes were treated for corneal edema or bullous keratopathy and 45 for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Seven eyes were phakic and 43 were Pseudophakic. Six months after surgery, mean manifest cylinder was 1.5±0.94 diopters (D), unchanged from preoperative cylinder of 1.5±1.0 D. Mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction was 0.15 ±1.5 D at 6-month follow-up compared with -0.36±1.4 D preoperatively (P=.10) At 3- and 6-month follow-up, significant improvement was noted in mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity compared with the preoperative mean of 20/100 (P=.007). At 6-month follow-up, 31 (62%) eyes refracted to ≥20/40 and 38 (76%) eyes saw ≥20/50. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to standard penetrating keratoplasty, DSEK causes minimal refractive change and provides rapid visual recovery for patients with endothelial dysfunction. This technique maintains the structural integrity of the cornea by preserving the recipient's epithelium, Bowman's layer, and entire stromal thickness. [J Refract Surg. 2005;21:339-345.]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/1081-597x-20050701-07

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 590

Metadata

Authors
Price, F. W., & Price, M. O.
Venue
Journal of Refractive Surgery
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2005-07
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
339-345
ISSN
  • 1042-962X (ISSN-L)
  • 1081-597X
OpenAlex
W29947478
Cited by
590
References
0
FWCI
27.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Descemet's Stripping With Endothelial Keratoplasty in 50 Eyes: A Refractive Neutral Corneal Transplant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3928/1081-597x-20050701-07
The paper
Price, F. W., & Price, M. O. (2005). Descemet's Stripping With Endothelial Keratoplasty in 50 Eyes: A Refractive Neutral Corneal Transplant. Journal of Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597x-20050701-07

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.