Cited by 227Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal and Macular SurgeryRetinal Development and Disorders

A Technique for Retinal Pigment Epithelium Transplantation for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Secondary to Extensive Subfoveal Scarring

Peyman, Gholam A, Blinder, Kevin J, Paris, Christopher L, Alturki, Walid, Nelson, Norman C, Desai, Uday·1991·Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina

Abstract

ABSTRACT We describe the surgical excision of submacular scar in end-stage age-related macular degeneration and transplantation of autologous and homologous retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. The technique involves the preparation of a large retinal flap encompassing the macula and the arcades, removal of the submacular scar, and replacement of the RPE cells, using either an autologous pedido graft or homologous RPE cells and Bruch's membrane. Fourteen months following the procedure, visual acuity in a patient with a pedicle graft had improved from counts fingers to 20/400 and the patient fixated over the transplanted RPE cells. After 10 months, a homologous graft in a second patient had become encapsulated with a fine subretinal membrane without neovascular tissue; visual acuity had not improved. No intraoperative or postoperative complications resulting from the surgery occurred in either patient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/1542-8877-19910201-12

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 227

Authors
Peyman, G. A., Blinder, K. J., Paris, C. L., Alturki, W., Nelson, N. C., & Desai, U.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Venue
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
1991-02
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
102-108
ISSN
  • 1542-8877 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-8160
  • 2325-8179
OpenAlex
W2418423387
Cited by
227
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ey007541-02)
  • National Eye Institute (EY-02377, P30EY002377, EY07541)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
retinal pigment epithelium transplantation, age-related macular degeneration, Bruch's membrane, visual acuity outcomes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cicatrix, Female, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Methods, Pigment Epithelium of Eye, Surgical Flaps, Visual Acuity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review