Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1Web Application Security VulnerabilitiesSecurity and Verification in ComputingUser Authentication and Security Systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Security of User Interfaces: Attacks and Countermeasures

Open access
Malisa, Luka·2017·ETH Zurich

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.3929/ethz-b-000217453

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Malisa, L.
Venue
ETH Zurich
Publisher
ETH Zurich
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2917757812
Cited by
1
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords
user interface security, attacks, countermeasures, human-computer interaction security, user authentication, biometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.