Cited by 60Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Dark Model Adaptation: Semantic Image Segmentation from Daytime to Nighttime

Open access
Dai, Dengxin, Van Gool, Luc·2018·ETH Zurich

Abstract

This work addresses the problem of semantic image segmentation of nighttime scenes.Although considerable progress has been made in semantic image segmentation, it is mainly related to daytime scenarios.This paper proposes a novel method to progressive adapt the semantic models trained on daytime scenes, along with large-scale annotations therein, to nighttime scenes via the bridge of twilight time -the time between dawn and sunrise, or between sunset and dusk.The goal of the method is to alleviate the cost of human annotation for nighttime images by transferring knowledge from standard daytime conditions.In addition to the method, a new dataset of road scenes is compiled; it consists of 35,000 images ranging from daytime to twilight time and to nighttime.Also, a subset of the nighttime images are densely annotated for method evaluation.Our experiments show that our method is effective for knowledge transfer from daytime scenes to nighttime scenes, without using extra human annotation.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.3929/ethz-b-000310974

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our findings on BDD100K contrast with previous findings that other tasks, such as object detection and segmentation, can suffer under the same types of shifts on the same dataset.

    “Our findings contrast with previous findings that other tasks, such as object detection and segmentation, can suffer under the same types of shifts on the same dataset (Yu et al., 2020; Dai and Van Gool, 2018).”

    From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Dai and Van Gool, 2018

  • Prior work showed worse test performance for segmentation and detection tasks on non-daytime images.

    “We contrast this with findings from Dai and Van Gool (2018); Yu et al. (2020), who showed worse test performance for segmentation and detection tasks, respectively, on non daytime images.”

    From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Dai and Van Gool (2018)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 60

Authors
Dai, D., & Van Gool, L.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
ETH Zurich
Publisher
ETH Zurich
Published
2018
Pages
3819-3824
OpenAlex
W2895777173
Cited by
60
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
Toyota Motor Europe
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
semantic segmentation, twilight, domain adaptation, knowledge transfer, annotation cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review