Thumbs up for brands: Influencer marketing in the era of social media
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sponsored posts by macroinfluencers are perceived as less authentic and more biased, while those by microinfluencers are perceived as more authentic and honest.
“While sponsored posts by macroinfluencers are perceived as less authentic and more biased, those by microinfluencers are perceived as more authentic and honest (Gross 2020).”
From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as Gross 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gross, J., & von Wangenheim, F. (2022) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2022.2123724 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“While sponsored posts by macroinfluencers are perceived as less authentic and more biased, those by microinfluencers are perceived as more authentic and honest (Gross 2020).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Gross, J.
- Corresponding author
- Gross, Jana
- ORCID
- Gross, Jana
- Venue
- ETH Zurich
- Publisher
- ETH Zurich
- Published
- 2020
- OpenAlex
- W3080662010
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Keywords
- influencer marketing, social media, brand, brand marketing, influencer endorsement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review