The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Theoria combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxiae
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bundle Adjustment — A Modern Synthesis
Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P. F., Hartley, R. I., & Fitzgibbon, A. W. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44480-7_21 · Cited by 3,988
Sliding window filter with application to planetary landing
Sibley, G., Matthies, L., & Sukhatme, G. (2010) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20360 · Cited by 259
Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta‐regression
Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2017) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1211 · Cited by 205
MesaNet: Sequence Modeling by Locally Optimal Test-Time Training
von Oswald, J., Scherrer, N., Kobayashi, S., Versari, L., Yang, S., Mittal, S., Schlegel, M., Maile, K., Schimpf, Y., Sieberling, O., et al. (2025) · arXiv
“The key observation is that ˆΦ mesa t , and that one can calculate the inverse R − 1 t recursively through the Sherman-Morrison formula [94, 33], While efficient for sequential inference, this solution is problematic for two reasons.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gauß, C. F.
- Published
- 1823-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2995648848
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoria combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxiae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3931/e-rara-2857
- The paper
- Gauß, C. F. (1823). Theoria combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxiae. https://doi.org/10.3931/e-rara-2857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
