The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet.
Instead of “playing the game” it is time to change the rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and beyond
Open accessAbstract
The last ten years have witnessed increasing awareness of questionable research practices (QRPs) in the life sciences [1,2], including p-hacking [3], HARKing [4], lack of replication [5], publication bias [6], low statistical power [7] and lack of data sharing ([8]; see Figure 1). Concerns about such behaviours have been raised repeatedly for over half a century [9–11] but the incentive structure of academia has not changed to address them. \nDespite the complex motivations that drive academia, many QRPs stem from the simple fact that the incentives which offer success to individual scientists conflict with what is best for science [12]. On the one hand are a set of gold standards that centuries of the scientific method have proven to be crucial for discovery: rigour, reproducibility, and transparency. On the other hand are a set of opposing principles born out of the academic career model: the drive to produce novel and striking results, the importance of confirming prior expectations, and the need to protect research interests from competitors. Within a culture that pressures scientists to produce rather than discover, the outcome is a biased and impoverished science in which most published results are either unconfirmed genuine discoveries or unchallenged fallacies [13]. This observation implies no moral judgement of scientists, who are as much victims of this system as they are perpetrators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Akin to the approach taken for clinical trials, protocol registration has emerged as a mechanism that is likely to improve the transparency of animal research [232,237,238].”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [237]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, in the Registered Report format offered by an increasing number of journals, protocols undergo peer review, and if accepted, the journal commits to publishing the completed research regardless of the results obtained [237].”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [237]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cook, R. J., Dickens, B. M., & Fathalla, M. F. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199241323.003.0025 · Cited by 10,825
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.225 · Cited by 3,688
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194105 · Cited by 2,490
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611430953 · Cited by 2,239
HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known
Kerr, N. L. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 · Cited by 1,989
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 213
Bowman, H., Brooks, J. L., Hajilou, O., Zoumpoulaki, A., & Vladimir Litvak, A. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008286 · Cited by 19
How we promote rigour in systematic reviews and evidence maps at Environment International
Whaley, P., & Roth, N. (2022) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107543 · Cited by 18
Religious belief and cognitive conflict sensitivity: A preregistered fMRI study
Hoogeveen, S., Snoek, L., & van Elk, M. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.011 · Cited by 19
Optimizing the scientific study of suicide with open and transparent research practices
Carpenter, T. P., & Law, K. C. (2021) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12665 · Cited by 20
Muhlert, N., & Ridgway, G. R. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.02.019 · Cited by 15
The benefits of preregistration for hypothesis-driven bilingualism research
Mertzen, D., Lago, S., & Vasishth, S. (2021) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728921000031 · Cited by 17
Pfeiffer, M., Kübler, A., & Hilger, K. (2024) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105696 · Cited by 15
Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing
Prager, E. M., Chambers, K. E., Plotkin, J. L., McArthur, D. L., Bandrowski, A. E., Bansal, N., Martone, M. E., Bergstrom, H. C., Bespalov, A., & Graf, C. (2018) · Cancer Reports · doi:10.1002/cnr2.1150 · Cited by 15
Creativity and the Cyber Shock: The Ultimate Paradox
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2023) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.625 · Cited by 14
A dream EEG and mentation database
Wong, W., Herzog, R. A., Andrade, K. C., Andrillon, T., de Araújo, D. B., Arnulf, I., Ataei, S., Avvenuti, G., Baird, B., Bellesi, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61945-1 · Cited by 27
Cumulative Science via Bayesian Posterior Passing
Brand, C. O., Ounsley, J., van der Post, D. J., & Morgan, T. J. H. (2019) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2017.840 · Cited by 17
Introducing New Open Science Practices at EJPA
Greiff, S., van der Westhuizen, L., Mund, M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Wetzel, E. (2020) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000628 · Cited by 14
Demidenko, M. I., Ip, K. I., Kelly, D. P., Constante, K., Goetschius, L. G., & Keating, D. P. (2021) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.032 · Cited by 14
Makowski, D., Sperduti, M., Pelletier, J., Blondé, P., Corte, V. L., Arcangeli, M., Zalla, T., Lemaire, S., Dokic, J., Nicolas, S., et al. (2019) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-018-00681-0 · Cited by 14
A Systems Approach to Understanding and Improving Research Integrity
Gorman, D. M., Elkins, A. D., & Lawley, M. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9986-z · Cited by 14
Open science practices for eating disorders research
Burke, N. L., Frank, G., Hilbert, A., Hildebrandt, T., Klump, K. L., Thomas, J. J., Wade, T. D., Walsh, B. T., Wang, S. B., & Weissman, R. S. (2021) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23607 · Cited by 12
New ways of seeing: Four ways you have not thought about Registered Reports yet
Gerpott, F. H., Briker, R., & Banks, G. C. (2024) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101783 · Cited by 11
Forschungstransparenz als hohes wissenschaftliches Gut stärken
Schönbrodt, F. D., Maier, M., Heene, M., & Bühner, M. (2018) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000386 · Cited by 12
Towards a comprehensive model of scientific research and professional practice in psychology
Brzeziński, J. M. (2016) · Current Issues in Personality Psychology · doi:10.5114/cipp.2016.58442 · Cited by 11
Three-stage publishing to support evidence-based management practice
Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2021) · WPOM - Working Papers on Operations Management · doi:10.4995/wpom.11755 · Cited by 11
Lakens, D. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dtvs7 · Cited by 16
Clayson, P. E., Carbine, K. A., Shuford, J. L., McDonald, J. B., & Larson, M. J. (2025) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2025.02.008 · Cited by 11
Niven, K. R., & Boorman, L. W. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2097 · Cited by 11
Replication, Registration, and Scientific Creativity
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617739421 · Cited by 10
Griffin, C. E., & Powell, G. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2492701 · Cited by 10
Single paper meta‐analysis is unavoidable
McShane, B., & Böckenholt, U. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1462 · Cited by 7
Pang, R. Y., Reinecke, K., & Just, R. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517707 · Cited by 10
Kavanagh, C. M., & Kapitány, R. (2020) · Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion · doi:10.1558/jcsr.38713 · Cited by 11
Cook, B. G. (2016) · Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.17988/0198-7429-41.3.161 · Cited by 9
A registered report format for Psychophysiology
Keil, A., Gatzke‐Kopp, L. M., Horváth, J., Jennings, J. R., & Fabiani, M. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13663 · Cited by 9
Advancing the Rigour and Integrity of Our Science: The Registered Reports Initiative
Probst, T. M., & Hagger, M. S. (2015) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2645 · Cited by 9
Reis, D., & Friese, M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_5 · Cited by 12
Demidenko, M. I., Mumford, J. A., Ram, N., & Poldrack, R. A. (2023) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101337 · Cited by 8
Preprints: a tool and a vehicle towards greater reproducibility in the life sciences
Puebla, I. (2020) · Journal for Reproducibility in Neuroscience · doi:10.31885/jrn.2.2021.1465 · Cited by 10
Csifcsák, G., Boayue, N. M., Aslaksen, P. M., Turi, Z., Antal, A., Groot, J. M., Hawkins, G. E., Forstmann, B. U., Opitz, A., Thielscher, A., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00130 · Cited by 8
Supporting study registration to reduce research waste
Purgar, M., Glasziou, P., Klanjšček, T., Nakagawa, S., & Čulina, A. (2024) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02433-5 · Cited by 15
Toward Open Science: Contributing to Research Culture Change
Shaw, L. C., Errington, T. M., & Mellor, D. T. (2022) · Science Editor · doi:10.36591/se-d-4501-14 · Cited by 11
Rejection Odds and Rejection Ratios: A Proposal for Statistical Practice in Testing HypothesesPreprint
Jorge, M. B., Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2714185 · Cited by 7
Storkel, H. L., & Gallun, F. J. (2022) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00513 · Cited by 8
The Elephant in the Room: p-hacking and Accounting Research
Gow, I. D. (2023) · Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium · doi:10.1515/ael-2022-0111 · Cited by 6
A Peer-To-Peer Publication Model on Blockchain
Khan, I., & Shahaab, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2021.615726 · Cited by 8
Attwood, A. S., & Munafo, M. R. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.016 · Cited by 6
Research as Artisanship versus Research as Generation of Novelty: The March to Nowhere
Cropley, A. J. (2018) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2018.1500190 · Cited by 6
The Limitations of Social Science as the Arbiter of Blame: An Argument for Abandoning Retribution
Tullett, A. M. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211033284 · Cited by 7
Replications in economic psychology and behavioral economics
Schultze, T., Huber, J., Kirchler, M., & Mojzisch, A. (2019) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2019.102199 · Cited by 6
The Problem of New Evidence: P-Hacking and Pre-Analysis Plans
Hitzig, Z., & Stegenga, J. (2020) · Diametros · doi:10.33392/diam.1587 · Cited by 9
Lakens, D. (2025) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.1038 · Cited by 9
Til, K. V., Phillips, N. L., Du, T. V., Rose, L., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2025) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026251331550 · Cited by 6
Writing Strong Conference Abstracts
Fallon, M., & Green, B. A. (2018) · Eye on Psi Chi Magazine · doi:10.24839/2164-9812.eye22.4.40 · Cited by 5
Reconsidering what makes syntheses of psychological intervention studies useful
Sakaluk, J. K., Santis, C. D., Kilshaw, R. E., Pittelkow, M.-M., Brandes, C. M., Boness, C. L., Botanov, Y., Williams, A. J., Wendt, D. C., Lorenzo‐Luaces, L., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00213-9 · Cited by 5
Riesthuis, P., & Otgaar, H. (2024) · Journal of Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1108/jcp-04-2024-0031 · Cited by 5
Only Human: Scientists, Systems, and Suspect Statistics
Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E., & Magis‐Weinberg, L. (2014) · Opticon1826 · doi:10.5334/opt.ch · Cited by 5
Fox, N. W., Honeycutt, N., & Jussim, L. J. (2022) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2020.2601 · Cited by 6
Evaluating Registered Reports Funding Partnerships: a feasibility study
Clark, R., Drax, K., Chambers, C. D., Munafò, M., & Thompson, J. (2021) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17028.1 · Cited by 5
Open Science: Recommendations for Research on School Bullying
Noret, N. F., Hunter, S. C., Pimenta, S. M., Taylor, R., & Johnson, R. (2022) · International Journal of Bullying Prevention · doi:10.1007/s42380-022-00130-0 · Cited by 7
Open Science in the Field of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Cook, B. G., Lloyd, J. W., & Therrien, W. J. (2019) · Education and Treatment of Children · doi:10.1353/etc.2019.0027 · Cited by 4
Reproducibility as a Technical SpecificationPreprint
Crick, T., Hall, B. A., & Ishtiaq, S. S. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.01310 · Cited by 4
Zeigler‐Hill, V., & Shackelford, T. K. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_302244 · Cited by 5
Introducing Registered Reports to the Information Systems Community
Weinhardt, C., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Hinz, O. F. (2019) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-019-00602-6 · Cited by 4
Hill, C. R., Samendinger, S., & Rymal, A. M. (2020) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaaa080 · Cited by 3
Lamer, S. A., Beck, H. B., ten Brinke, L., & Preston, G. M. (2025) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/03616843251318964 · Cited by 4
Maggin, D. M., Robertson, R. E., & Cook, B. G. (2020) · Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.1177/0198742920936619 · Cited by 3
What is critical metascience and why is it important?
Rubin, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1860740 · Cited by 2
Two Questions to Foster Critical Thinking in the Field of Psychology
Holtz, P. (2020) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2018.984 · Cited by 3
Registered Reports: A new chapter at Ecology & Evolution
Gya, R., Birkeli, K., Dahle, I. J., Foote, C. G., Geange, S. R., Lynn, J. S., Töpper, J. P., Vandvik, V., Zernichow, C., & Jenkins, G. B. (2023) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.10023 · Cited by 2
Registered Reports in School Psychology Research: Initial Experiences, Analyses, and Future
Shaw, S. R., Pecsi, S., Infantino, E., Kang, Y. H., Verma, N., & von Hagen, A. (2024) · Canadian Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1177/08295735241263912 · Cited by 2
Roth, N., Yang, Y., Coulon, F., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., & Covaci, A. (2026) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2026.110216 · Cited by 3
Research on Application and Impact of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
Bradbury, M. E., & Howieson, B. A. (2022) · Australian Accounting Review · doi:10.1111/auar.12391 · Cited by 1
Psychology and Law, Meet Open Science
McAuliff, B. D., Fessinger, M. B., Perillo, A. D., & Perillo, J. T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.5 · Cited by 1
When are small-scale field experiments in solar geoengineering worth pursuing?
O’Loughlin, R., & Visioni, D. (2026) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-026-00762-9 · Cited by 1
Bruna, E. M., Chazdon, R. L., Errington, T. M., & Nosek, B. A. (2021) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/btp.12912 · Cited by 1
Kara, E. (2023) · Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International · doi:10.18039/ajesi.1240655 · Cited by 1
Schmidt, M. H. M., & Dluzen, D. F. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817218-6.00012-7 · Cited by 1
Aarts, E., & Aidy, S. E. (2019) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x18002777 · Cited by 1
Ocakoğlu, G., Macunluoğlu, A. C., Can, F. E., KAYMAK, B., & YİVLİK, Z. (2019) · The European Research Journal · doi:10.18621/eurj.468686 · Cited by 1
ORM-CARMA Virtual Feature Topics for Advanced Reviewer Development
Williams, L. J., Banks, G. C., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2021) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/10944281211030648 · Cited by 1
Comments on methodological and reporting quality in laboratory studies of human eating behaviour
Robinson, E., Bevelander, K. E., Field, M., & Jones, A. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.07.001 · Cited by 1
Improving pedagogy through Registered Reports
McAleer, P., & Paterson, H. (2021) · Open Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.56230/osotl.13 · Cited by 1
The Solution to Science's Replication CrisisPreprint
Knuteson, B. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2835131 · Cited by 2
Open Science in the Field of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersPreprint
Cook, B. G., Lloyd, J. W., & Therrien, W. J. (2019) · EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/duvf8 · Cited by 1
How to build up big team science: A practical guide for large-scale collaborationsPreprint
Baumgartner, H. A., Alessandroni, N., Byers‐Heinlein, K., Frank, M. C., Hamlin, J. K., Söderström, M., Voelkel, J. G., Willer, R., Yuen, F., & Coles, N. A. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/j7mt4 · Cited by 1
Hirschhorn, R., & Schönberg, T. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820480-1.00014-0 · Cited by 1
Demidenko, M. I., Mumford, J. A., Ram, N., & Poldrack, R. A. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xh9mz · Cited by 1
Contexts of empirical research in the social sciences
Brzeziński, J. M. (2016) · Człowiek i Społeczeństwo · doi:10.14746/cis.2016.41.12
Registered reports for Consciousness and Cognition
Francis, G., & Bachmann, T. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.10.007
Sex differences in social learning : exploring the links with risk aversion and confidence
Brand, C. O. (2017) · St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository)
Toward Reasonable Experimental Inquiry
Lauwereyns, J. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89300-6_5
Never Worry Alone! Mental Health Awareness With Phil McGraw, PhD
Sutter, M. (2018) · Eye on Psi Chi Magazine · doi:10.24839/2164-9812.eye22.4.24
The Secret Life of Professors Revealed Part II: The Mystery Job
Vernon, L. L. (2018) · Eye on Psi Chi Magazine · doi:10.24839/2164-9812.eye22.4.8
Throw Away What You've Heard About Learning Styles, With Megan Sumeracki, PhD
Sutter, M. (2018) · Eye on Psi Chi Magazine · doi:10.24839/2164-9812.eye22.4.32
Haas, H. A., Wofford, A., & Binns-Calvey, M. (2018) · Eye on Psi Chi Magazine · doi:10.24839/2164-9812.eye22.4.36
From Job Outlook to Job Search: Advice From Experts
Hettich, P. I. (2018) · Eye on Psi Chi Magazine · doi:10.24839/2164-9812.eye22.4.10
Research Integrity in Public Health
Gorman, D. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756797-0189
On the Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses
Lakens, D. (2018) · doi:10.23668/psycharchives.2441
A Human-Computer Interaction Approach for Integrity in EconomicsPreprint
Opoku-Agyemang, K. A. (2017) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/ra3cs
The Solution to Science's Replication CrisisPreprint
Knuteson, B. (2016) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.03223
Some Issues in Interpreting Neuroscientific Evidence
Kucharzyk, B. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108623056.020
PETIT, E. J. (2021) · Peer Community In Ecology · doi:10.24072/pci.ecology.100079
Giorgi, F. (2021) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/n5y8b
Almgren, H., Parsons, N., Bossche, S. V. D., & Marinazzo, D. (2020) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/9hg3j
Metadata
- Authors
- D. Chambers, C., 1 Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, S. O. P., Feredoes, E., D. Muthukumaraswamy, S., & J. Etchells, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Reading (GB)
- ORCID
- Feredoes, Eva
- Venue
- AIMS Neuroscience
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-17
- ISSN
- 2373-7972 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072600048
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 27.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- AIMS neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/K008277/1, BB/C519854/2)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- questionable research practices, p-hacking, HARKing, replication, publication bias, statistical power, data sharing, research incentives, reproducibility, transparency, brain research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
