Cited by 111Obesity, Physical Activity, DietPhysical Activity and HealthBreastfeeding Practices and Influences

Diet and exercise weight-loss trial in lactating overweight and obese women

Open access
Bertz, Fredrik, Brekke, Hilde K, Ellegård, Lars, Rasmussen, Kathleen M, Wennergren, Margareta, Winkvist, Anna·2012·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Current evidence suggests a combined treatment of postpartum weight loss of diet and exercise. However, to our knowledge, neither their separate and interactive effects nor long-term outcomes have been evaluated. Objective We evaluated whether a 12-wk dietary behavior modification (D) treatment to decrease energy intake, physical exercise behavior modification (E) treatment to implement moderate aerobic exercise, or combined dietary and physical exercise behavior modification (DE) treatment compared with control (usual care) (C) reduces body weight in lactating women measured at the end of treatment and at a 1-y follow-up 9 mo after treatment termination. Design At 10-14 wk postpartum, 68 lactating Swedish women with a prepregnancy BMI (in kg/m²) of 25-35 were randomly assigned to D, E, DE, or C groups. Measurements were made at baseline, after the intervention, and again at a 1-y follow-up 9 mo later. A 2 × 2 factorial approach was used to analyze main and interaction effects of treatments. Results Weight changes after the intervention and 1-y follow-up were -8.3 ± 4.2 and -10.2 ± 5.7 kg, respectively, in the D group; -2.4 ± 3.2 and -2.7 ± 5.9 kg, respectively, in the E group; -6.9 ± 3.0 and -7.3 ± 6.3 kg, respectively, in the DE group; and -0.8 ± 3.0 and -0.9 ± 6.6 kg, respectively, in the C group. The main effects of D treatment, but not of E treatment, on weight were significant at both times (P < 0.001). Conclusions Dietary treatment provided clinically relevant weight loss in lactating postpartum women, which was sustained at 9 mo after treatment. The combined treatment did not yield significant weight or body-composition changes beyond those of dietary treatment alone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.112.040196

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 111

Authors
Bertz, F., Brekke, H. K., Ellegård, L., Rasmussen, K. M., Wennergren, M., & Winkvist, A.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Bertz, Fredrik
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
698-705
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980490475
Cited by
111
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Keywords
postpartum weight loss, lactating women, overweight and obesity, physical activity, aerobic exercise, combined diet and exercise intervention, energy intake reduction, body composition, weight maintenance, prepregnancy BMI
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Body Composition, Diet, Reducing, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lactation, Obesity, Patient Dropouts, Patient Education as Topic, Sweden, Weight Loss, Exercise, Diet Records, Body Mass Index, Walking, Overweight, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review