Cited by 248Nutritional Studies and DietFatty Acid Research and HealthAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Associations between red meat intake and biomarkers of inflammation and glucose metabolism in women

Open access
Ley, Sylvia H, Sun, Qi, Willett, Walter C, Eliassen, A Heather, Wu, Kana, Pan, An, Grodstein, Fran, Hu, Frank B·2014·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Greater red meat intake is associated with an increased type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk. However, the relation of red meat intake to biomarkers of inflammation and glucose metabolism has not been investigated thoroughly.Objective We hypothesized that greater red meat intake would be associated with biomarkers of inflammation and glucose metabolism, which would be partly explained by body mass index (BMI).Design We analyzed cross-sectional data from diabetes-free female participants in the Nurses' Health Study (n = 3690). Multiple linear regression was conducted to assess the associations of total, unprocessed, and processed red meat intakes (quartile categories) with plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, adiponectin, fasting insulin, and hemoglobin A1c (Hb A1c).Results Greater total, unprocessed, and processed red meat intakes were associated with higher plasma CRP, ferritin, fasting insulin, and Hb A1c and lower adiponectin after adjustment for demographic information (P-trend ≤ 0.03 for all). Adiponectin was not associated with any type of red meat intake when further adjusted for medical and lifestyle factors. After adjustment for BMI, most of these associations with inflammatory and glucose metabolic biomarkers were substantially attenuated and no longer significant. BMI accounted for a statistically significant proportion of associations with CRP, Hb A1c, and fasting insulin (P-contribution ≤ 0.02 for all) but not with ferritin. Substituting a serving of total red meat intake with alternative protein food in a combination of poultry, fish, legumes, and nuts was associated with significantly lower CRP (β ± SE: -0.106 ± 0.043), ferritin (-0.212 ± 0.075), Hb A1c (-0.052 ± 0.015), and fasting insulin (-0.119 ± 0.036) (all P ≤ 0.02 for comparison of extreme quartiles for all).Conclusions Greater red meat intake is associated with unfavorable plasma concentrations of inflammatory and glucose metabolic biomarkers in diabetes-free women. BMI accounts for a significant proportion of the associations with these biomarkers, except for ferritin. Substituting red meat with another protein food is associated with a healthier biomarker profile of inflammatory and glucose metabolism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.113.075663

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 248

Authors
Ley, S. H., Sun, Q., Willett, W. C., Eliassen, A. H., Wu, K., Pan, A., Grodstein, F., & Hu, F. B.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Ley, Sylvia H
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
352-360
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171229097
Cited by
248
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA-49449, DK46200, DK58845, CA 87969, DK58785)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-49449, CA-87969, P01CA087969, U54CA155626)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK058845, P30DK046200, DK 58785, P30 DK-46200, DK58845)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
red meat consumption, processed meat, inflammatory markers, glucose metabolism, C-reactive protein, ferritin, adiponectin, fasting insulin, HbA1c, body mass index, poultry, fish, Fabaceae, nuts, women, Nurses' Health Study
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Glucose, C-Reactive Protein, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cattle, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Female, Ferritins, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Inflammation, Insulin, Life Style, Meat, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sheep, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Linear Models, Adiponectin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review