Cited by 209Dietary Effects on HealthRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The causal role of breakfast in energy balance and health: A randomized controlled trial in lean adults

Open access
Betts, James A, Richardson, Judith D, Chowdhury, Enhad A, Holman, Geoffrey D, Tsintzas, Kostas, Thompson, Dylan·2014·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Popular beliefs that breakfast is the most important meal of the day are grounded in cross-sectional observations that link breakfast to health, the causal nature of which remains to be explored under real-life conditions. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to conduct a randomized controlled trial examining causal links between breakfast habits and all components of energy balance in free-living humans. DESIGN: The Bath Breakfast Project is a randomized controlled trial with repeated-measures at baseline and follow-up in a cohort in southwest England aged 21-60 y with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived fat mass indexes ≤11 kg/m² in women (n = 21) and ≤7.5 kg/m² in men (n = 12). Components of energy balance (resting metabolic rate, physical activity thermogenesis, energy intake) and 24-h glycemic responses were measured under free-living conditions with random allocation to daily breakfast (≥700 kcal before 1100) or extended fasting (0 kcal until 1200) for 6 wk, with baseline and follow-up measures of health markers (eg, hematology/biopsies). RESULTS: Contrary to popular belief, there was no metabolic adaptation to breakfast (eg, resting metabolic rate stable within 11 kcal/d), with limited subsequent suppression of appetite (energy intake remained 539 kcal/d greater than after fasting; 95% CI: 157, 920 kcal/d). Rather, physical activity thermogenesis was markedly higher with breakfast than with fasting (442 kcal/d; 95% CI: 34, 851 kcal/d). Body mass and adiposity did not differ between treatments at baseline or follow-up and neither did adipose tissue glucose uptake or systemic indexes of cardiovascular health. Continuously measured glycemia was more variable during the afternoon and evening with fasting than with breakfast by the final week of the intervention (CV: 3.9%; 95% CI: 0.1%, 7.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Daily breakfast is causally linked to higher physical activity thermogenesis in lean adults, with greater overall dietary energy intake but no change in resting metabolism. Cardiovascular health indexes were unaffected by either of the treatments, but breakfast maintained more stable afternoon and evening glycemia than did fasting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.114.083402

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 209

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [44]Staub H Examination of sugar metabolisms in humans. Z Klin Med 1921; 91: 44– 8.

Authors
Betts, J. A., Richardson, J. D., Chowdhury, E. A., Holman, G. D., Tsintzas, K., & Thompson, D.
Affiliations
Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
539-547
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210370016
Cited by
209
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 3
FWCI
13.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (PG/11/52/28989)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K00414X/1, MR/J003417/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/H008322/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
breakfast, energy balance, resting metabolic rate, energy intake, appetite suppression, glycemic variability, adipose tissue glucose uptake, cardiovascular health, lean adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Appetite Regulation, Blood Glucose, Energy Intake, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Promotion, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Up-Regulation, Thermogenesis, Young Adult, Breakfast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review