The causal role of breakfast in energy balance and health: A randomized controlled trial in lean adults
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Popular beliefs that breakfast is the most important meal of the day are grounded in cross-sectional observations that link breakfast to health, the causal nature of which remains to be explored under real-life conditions. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to conduct a randomized controlled trial examining causal links between breakfast habits and all components of energy balance in free-living humans. DESIGN: The Bath Breakfast Project is a randomized controlled trial with repeated-measures at baseline and follow-up in a cohort in southwest England aged 21-60 y with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived fat mass indexes ≤11 kg/m² in women (n = 21) and ≤7.5 kg/m² in men (n = 12). Components of energy balance (resting metabolic rate, physical activity thermogenesis, energy intake) and 24-h glycemic responses were measured under free-living conditions with random allocation to daily breakfast (≥700 kcal before 1100) or extended fasting (0 kcal until 1200) for 6 wk, with baseline and follow-up measures of health markers (eg, hematology/biopsies). RESULTS: Contrary to popular belief, there was no metabolic adaptation to breakfast (eg, resting metabolic rate stable within 11 kcal/d), with limited subsequent suppression of appetite (energy intake remained 539 kcal/d greater than after fasting; 95% CI: 157, 920 kcal/d). Rather, physical activity thermogenesis was markedly higher with breakfast than with fasting (442 kcal/d; 95% CI: 34, 851 kcal/d). Body mass and adiposity did not differ between treatments at baseline or follow-up and neither did adipose tissue glucose uptake or systemic indexes of cardiovascular health. Continuously measured glycemia was more variable during the afternoon and evening with fasting than with breakfast by the final week of the intervention (CV: 3.9%; 95% CI: 0.1%, 7.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Daily breakfast is causally linked to higher physical activity thermogenesis in lean adults, with greater overall dietary energy intake but no change in resting metabolism. Cardiovascular health indexes were unaffected by either of the treatments, but breakfast maintained more stable afternoon and evening glycemia than did fasting.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Results from few RCTs in lean and obese subjects suggest that skipping breakfast regardless of body weight may adversely affect insulin sensitivity.
“Results from few RCTs in lean and obese subjects suggest that skipping breakfast regardless of body weight may adversely affect insulin sensitivity [280,283].”
From Effects of diet, lifestyle, Chrononutrition and alternative dietary interventions on postprandial Glycemia and insulin resistance (2022) · cites this paper as [280]
In healthy individuals, glucose variability during the day was higher in the fasting group.
“only glucose variability during the day was reported to be higher in the fasting group [280].”
From Effects of diet, lifestyle, Chrononutrition and alternative dietary interventions on postprandial Glycemia and insulin resistance (2022) · cites this paper as [280]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 209
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [44]Staub H Examination of sugar metabolisms in humans. Z Klin Med 1921; 91: 44– 8.
- Authors
- Betts, J. A., Richardson, J. D., Chowdhury, E. A., Holman, G. D., Tsintzas, K., & Thompson, D.
- Affiliations
- Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 539-547
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4095658
- OpenAlex
- W4210370016
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 13.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- British Heart Foundation (PG/11/52/28989)
- Medical Research Council (MR/K00414X/1, MR/J003417/1)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/H008322/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- breakfast, energy balance, resting metabolic rate, energy intake, appetite suppression, glycemic variability, adipose tissue glucose uptake, cardiovascular health, lean adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Appetite Regulation, Blood Glucose, Energy Intake, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Promotion, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Up-Regulation, Thermogenesis, Young Adult, Breakfast
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review