Dietary cholesterol and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background Dietary cholesterol has been suggested to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which has led to US recommendations to reduce cholesterol intake.Objective The authors examine the effects of dietary cholesterol on CVD risk in healthy adults by using systematic review and meta-analysis.Design MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau Abstracts databases were searched through December 2013 for prospective studies that quantified dietary cholesterol. Investigators independently screened citations and verified extracted data on study and participant characteristics, outcomes, and quality. Random-effect models meta-analysis was used when at least 3 studies reported the same CVD outcome.Results Forty studies (17 cohorts in 19 publications with 361,923 subjects and 19 trials in 21 publications with 632 subjects) published between 1979 and 2013 were eligible for review. Dietary cholesterol was not statistically significantly associated with any coronary artery disease (4 cohorts; no summary RR), ischemic stroke (4 cohorts; summary RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.28), or hemorrhagic stroke (3 cohorts; summary RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.50). Dietary cholesterol statistically significantly increased both serum total cholesterol (17 trials; net change: 11.2 mg/dL; 95% CI: 6.4, 15.9) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (14 trials; net change: 6.7 mg/dL; 95% CI: 1.7, 11.7 mg/dL). Increases in LDL cholesterol were no longer statistically significant when intervention doses exceeded 900 mg/d. Dietary cholesterol also statistically significantly increased serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (13 trials; net change: 3.2 mg/dL; 95% CI: 0.9, 9.7 mg/dL) and the LDL to high-density lipoprotein ratio (5 trials; net change: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.0, 0.3). Dietary cholesterol did not statistically significantly change serum triglycerides or very-low-density lipoprotein concentrations.Conclusion Reviewed studies were heterogeneous and lacked the methodologic rigor to draw any conclusions regarding the effects of dietary cholesterol on CVD risk. Carefully adjusted and well-conducted cohort studies would be useful to identify the relative effects of dietary cholesterol on CVD risk.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cholesterol intake has correlated with serum cholesterol levels but has not correlated well with CVD events.
“Whereas cholesterol intake has correlated with serum cholesterol levels, it has not correlated well with CVD events (65,66).”
From Nutrition Therapy for Adults With Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Consensus Report (2019) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 356
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Reaven GM, Abbasi F, Bernhart S, Coulston A, Darnell B, Dashti N, Kim H, Kulkarni K, Lamendola C, McLaughlin T, et al. Insulin re- sistance, dietary cholesterol, and cholesterol concentration in post- menopausal women. Metabolism 2001;50:594-7.
- Authors
- Berger, S., Raman, G., Vishwanathan, R., Jacques, P. F., & Johnson, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Tufts Medical Center (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Elizabeth J
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 276-294
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131155809
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- USDA (1950-51000-073)
- American Egg Board, Egg Nutrition Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Keywords
- dietary cholesterol, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL/HDL ratio, triglycerides, VLDL, cholesterol intake, dietary intervention trials, cohort studies, heterogeneity of study results, saturated fat, dietary fiber
- MeSH terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Brain Ischemia, Cholesterol, Cholesterol, Dietary, Coronary Artery Disease, Hemorrhagic Disorders, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Stroke, Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review