The causal role of breakfast in energy balance and health: A randomized controlled trial in obese adults
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The causal nature of associations between breakfast and health remain unclear in obese individuals. OBJECTIVE: We sought to conduct a randomized controlled trial to examine causal links between breakfast habits and components of energy balance in free-living obese humans. DESIGN: The Bath Breakfast Project is a randomized controlled trial with repeated measures at baseline and follow-up among a cohort in South West England aged 21-60 y with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived fat mass indexes of ≥13 kg/m(2) for women (n = 15) and ≥9 kg/m(2) for men (n = 8). Components of energy balance (resting metabolic rate, physical activity thermogenesis, diet-induced thermogenesis, and energy intake) were measured under free-living conditions with random allocation to daily breakfast (≥700 kcal before 1100) or extended fasting (0 kcal until 1200) for 6 wk, with baseline and follow-up measures of health markers (e.g., hematology/adipose biopsies). RESULTS: Breakfast resulted in greater physical activity thermogenesis during the morning than when fasting during that period (difference: 188 kcal/d; 95% CI: 40, 335) but without any consistent effect on 24-h physical activity thermogenesis (difference: 272 kcal/d; 95% CI: -254, 798). Energy intake was not significantly greater with breakfast than fasting (difference: 338 kcal/d; 95% CI: -313, 988). Body mass increased across both groups over time but with no treatment effects on body composition or any change in resting metabolic rate (stable within 8 kcal/d). Metabolic/cardiovascular health also did not respond to treatments, except for a reduced insulinemic response to an oral-glucose-tolerance test over time with daily breakfast relative to an increase with daily fasting (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In obese adults, daily breakfast leads to greater physical activity during the morning, whereas morning fasting results in partial dietary compensation (i.e., greater energy intake) later in the day. There were no differences between groups in weight change and most health outcomes, but insulin sensitivity increased with breakfast relative to fasting. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.org as ISRCTN31521726.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Results from few RCTs in lean and obese subjects suggest that skipping breakfast regardless of body weight may adversely affect insulin sensitivity.
“Results from few RCTs in lean and obese subjects suggest that skipping breakfast regardless of body weight may adversely affect insulin sensitivity [280,283].”
From Effects of diet, lifestyle, Chrononutrition and alternative dietary interventions on postprandial Glycemia and insulin resistance (2022) · cites this paper as [283]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 255
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [28]Batterham RL, Cohen MA, Ellis SM, Le Roux CW, Withers DJ, Frost GS, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR Inhibition of food intake in obese subjects by peptide YY3-36. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 941– 8. 12954742
- Authors
- Chowdhury, E. A., Richardson, J. D., Holman, G. D., Tsintzas, K., Thompson, D., & Betts, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Bath (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Betts, James A
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 747-756
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4763497
- OpenAlex
- W2115616757
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 24.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/H008322/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- breakfast, obesity, energy balance, resting metabolic rate, energy intake, insulin sensitivity, oral glucose tolerance test, body composition, adipose tissue
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Adult, Appetite Regulation, Basal Metabolism, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Eating, Energy Metabolism, Fasting, Female, Health, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Thermogenesis, Breakfast
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review