Severe obesity, gestational weight gain, and adverse birth outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Background The 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee to Reevaluate Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines concluded that there were too few data to inform weight-gain guidelines by obesity severity. Therefore, the committee recommended a single range, 5-9 kg at term, for all obese women.Objective We explored associations between gestational weight gain and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births, large-for-gestational-age (LGA) births, spontaneous preterm births (sPTBs), and medically indicated preterm births (iPTBs) among obese women who were stratified by severity of obesity.Design We studied a cohort of singleton, live-born infants without congenital anomalies born to obesity class 1 (prepregnancy body mass index [BMI (in kg/m(2))]: 30-34.9; n = 3254), class 2 (BMI: 35-39.9; n = 1451), and class 3 (BMI: > or =40; n = 845) mothers. We defined the adequacy of gestational weight gain as the ratio of observed weight gain to IOM-recommended gestational weight gain.Results The prevalence of excessive gestational weight gain declined, and weight loss increased, as obesity became more severe. Generally, weight loss was associated with an elevated risk of SGA, iPTB, and sPTB, and a high weight gain tended to increase the risk of LGA and iPTB. Weight gains associated with probabilities of SGA and LGA of < or =10% and a minimal risk of iPTB and sPTB were as follows: 9.1-13.5 kg (obesity class 1), 5.0-9 kg (obesity class 2), 2.2 to <5.0 kg (obesity class 3 white women), and <2.2 kg (obesity class 3 black women).Conclusion These data suggest that the range of gestational weight gain to balance risks of SGA, LGA, sPTB, and iPTB may vary by severity of obesity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Institute of Medicine published recommended guidelines on appropriate GWG first in 1990 and revised them in 2009.
“the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published the recommended guidelines on appropriate GWG first in 1990 and revised in 2009 [10, 11].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 270
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [3]3. Weight Gain During Pregnancy IOM. Reexamining the guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009.
- [15]15. Bodnar LM, Siega-Riz AM, Arab L, Chantala K, McDonald T. Pre- dictors of pregnancy and postpartum iron status in low-income women. Public Health Nutr 2004;7:701-11.
- [22]22. Rizzo T, Metzger BE, Burns WJ, Burns K. Correlations between ante- partum maternal metabolism and child intelligence. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:911-6.
- Authors
- Bodnar, L. M., Siega-Riz, A. M., Simhan, H. N., Himes, K. P., & Abrams, B.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bodnar, Lisa M
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1642-1648
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2869513
- OpenAlex
- W2163445193
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 34.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (2r24hd050924-06, 5r01hd052732-05, R01 HD052732)
- National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH074092)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES010126)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD-052732, R24 HD-050924, R01HD056999, R01HD041663)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Keywords
- gestational weight gain, maternal obesity, obesity severity, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, excessive weight gain, IOM weight gain guidelines, racial differences
- MeSH terms
- Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, United States, Weight Gain, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review