Cited by 181Gut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Human gut bacterial communities are altered by addition of cruciferous vegetables to a controlled fruit- and vegetable-free diet

Open access
Fei, Li, Meredith A. J., Hullar, Yvonne, Schwarz, Johanna W., Lampe·2009·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

In the human gut, commensal bacteria metabolize food components that typically serve as energy sources. These components have the potential to influence gut bacterial community composition. Cruciferous vegetables, such as broccoli and cabbage, contain distinctive compounds that can be utilized by gut bacteria. For example, glucosinolates can be hydrolyzed by certain bacteria, and dietary fibers can be fermented by a range of species. We hypothesized that cruciferous vegetable consumption would alter growth of certain bacteria, thereby altering bacterial community composition. We tested this hypothesis in a randomized, crossover, controlled feeding study. Fecal samples were collected from 17 participants at the end of 2 14-d intake periods: a low-phytochemical, low-fiber basal diet (i.e. refined grains without fruits or vegetables) and a high ("double") cruciferous vegetable diet [basal diet + 14 g cruciferous vegetables/(kg body weightd)]. Fecal bacterial composition was analyzed by the terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (tRFLP) method using the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene and nucleotide sequencing. Using blocked multi-response permutation procedures analysis, we found that overall bacterial community composition differed between the 2 consumption periods (delta = 0.603; P = 0.011). The bacterial community response to cruciferous vegetables was individual-specific, as revealed by nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordination analysis. Specific tRFLP fragments that characterized each of the diets were identified using indicator species analysis. Putative species corresponding to these fragments were identified through gene sequencing as Eubacterium hallii, Phascolarctobacterium faecium, Burkholderiales spp., Alistipes putredinis, and Eggerthella spp. In conclusion, human gut bacterial community composition was altered by cruciferous vegetable consumption, which could ultimately influence gut metabolism of bioactive food components and host exposure to these compounds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/jn.109.108191

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A significant impact on the gut microbiota has previously been displayed through the consumption of cruciferous vegetables, walnuts, and almonds (consumption and processing) amongst others.

    “A significant impact on the gut microbiota has previously been displayed through the consumption of cruciferous vegetables, walnuts, and almonds (consumption and processing) amongst others [113,114,115].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 181

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kohlmeier L, Su L. Cruciferous vegetables consumption and colorectal cancer risk: meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence. FASEB J. 1997;11:A369.
  2. Rabot S, Guerin C, Nugon-Boudon L, Szylit O. Glucosinolate degra- dation by bacterial strains isolated from a human intestinal microflora. Proceedings from the 9th Internation Rapeseed Congress, organized by GCIRC (Group Consultatif International de Recherches sur le Colza. In English: International Group of Research on Rapeseed); 1995 July 4-7; Cambridge, UK.

Authors
Fei, L., Meredith A. J., H., Yvonne, S., & Johanna W., L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
139
Issue
9
Pages
1685-1691
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151392813
Cited by
181
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA070913)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
gut microbiota, cruciferous vegetables, dietary intervention, glucosinolates, dietary fiber fermentation, low-fiber diet, Eubacterium hallii, Phascolarctobacterium faecium, Alistipes putredinis, Eggerthella, broccoli, cabbage
MeSH terms
Adult, Bacteria, Base Sequence, Diet, Dietary Fiber, Feces, Female, Fruit, Humans, Male, Phylogeny, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Vegetables, Gene Library, Sequence Alignment, Cross-Over Studies, Brassicaceae, Gastrointestinal Tract, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review