Skeletal muscle disuse atrophy is not attenuated by dietary protein supplementation in healthy older men
Open accessAbstract
Short successive periods of muscle disuse, due to injury or illness, can contribute significantly to the loss of muscle mass with aging (sarcopenia). It has been suggested that increasing the protein content of the diet may be an effective dietary strategy to attenuate muscle disuse atrophy. We hypothesized that protein supplementation twice daily would preserve muscle mass during a short period of limb immobilization. Twenty-three healthy older (69 ± 1 y) men were subjected to 5 d of one-legged knee immobilization by means of a full-leg cast with (PRO group; n = 11) or without (CON group; n = 12) administration of a dietary protein supplement (20.7 g of protein, 9.3 g of carbohydrate, and 3.0 g of fat) twice daily. Two d prior to and immediately after the immobilization period, single-slice computed tomography scans of the quadriceps and single-leg 1 repetition maximum strength tests were performed to assess muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and leg muscle strength, respectively. Additionally, muscle biopsies were collected to assess muscle fiber characteristics as well as mRNA and protein expression of selected genes. Immobilization decreased quadriceps' CSAs by 1.5 ± 0.7% (P < 0.05) and 2.0 ± 0.6% (P < 0.05), and muscle strength by 8.3 ± 3.3% (P < 0.05) and 9.3 ± 1.6% (P < 0.05) in the CON and PRO groups, respectively, without differences between groups. Skeletal muscle myostatin, myogenin, and muscle RING-finger protein-1 (MuRF1) mRNA expression increased following immobilization in both groups (P < 0.05), whereas muscle atrophy F-box/atrogen-1 (MAFBx) mRNA expression increased in the PRO group only (P < 0.05). In conclusion, dietary protein supplementation (∼20 g twice daily) does not attenuate muscle loss during short-term muscle disuse in healthy older men. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01588808.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research has shown that daily whey protein supplementation at a dose considered suboptimal for older adults is ineffective at reducing skeletal muscle loss during immobilization.
“Previously, daily supplementation with WP, albeit at what we would consider a suboptimal dose for an older adult population (38), has been shown to be ineffective at reducing losses in skeletal muscle with immobilization (15).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 137
- Authors
- Dirks, M. L., Wall, B. T., Nilwik, R., Weerts, D. H. J. M., Verdijk, L. B., & van Loon, L. J. C.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
- Venue
- The Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1196-1203
- ISSN
- 0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157927792
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Danone
- Danone Nutricia Research
- Universiteit Maastricht
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- protein supplementation, sarcopenia, limb immobilization, muscle mass preservation, quadriceps cross-sectional area, muscle strength, myostatin, myogenin, MuRF1, atrogin-1, muscle fiber characteristics, older men
- MeSH terms
- Tripartite Motif Proteins, Aged, Energy Intake, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Immobilization, Male, Muscle Proteins, Surveys and Questionnaires, RNA, Messenger, Myogenin, Dietary Supplements, Muscular Disorders, Atrophic, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Quadriceps Muscle, Muscle Strength, Myostatin, Sarcopenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review