Cited by 23Diversity and Career in MedicineInnovations in Medical EducationMentoring and Academic Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a career coaching model for medical students

Open access
Hur, Yera·2016·Korean Journal of Medical Education

Abstract

PURPOSE: Deciding on a future career path or choosing a career specialty is an important academic decision for medical students. The purpose of this study is to develop a career coaching model for medical students. METHODS: This research was carried out in three steps. The first step was systematic review of previous studies. The second step was a need assessment of medical students. The third step was a career coaching model using the results acquired from the researched literature and the survey. RESULTS: The career coaching stages were defined as three big phases: The career coaching stages were defined as the "crystallization" period (Pre-medical year 1 and 2), "specification" period (medical year 1 and 2), and "implementation" period (medical year 3 and 4). CONCLUSION: The career coaching model for medical students can be used in programming career coaching contents and also in identifying the outcomes of career coaching programs at an institutional level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3946/kjme.2016.19

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. Research Procedure
Fig. 1. Research ProcedureCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. Career Coaching Structure
Fig. 2. Career Coaching StructureCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 3. Career Competencies Map
Fig. 3. Career Competencies MapCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 4. Career Coaching Program Map
Fig. 4. Career Coaching Program MapCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 5. Career Coaching Model: Final Version
Fig. 5. Career Coaching Model: Final VersionCC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hur, Y.
Affiliations
Konyang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Hur, Yera
Venue
Korean Journal of Medical Education
Published
2016-01-27
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
127-136
ISSN
  • 1225-8067 (ISSN-L)
  • 2005-727X
  • 2005-7288
OpenAlex
W2281025662
Cited by
23
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Korean journal of medical education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2014S1A5A2A01013740)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
Keywords
career coaching, medical students, career choice, career development model, needs assessment, medical education
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Career Choice, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Education, Premedical, Female, Humans, Male, Medicine, Students, Medical, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review