The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using flow cytometry for counting natural planktonic bacteria and understanding the structure of planktonic bacterial communities
Open accessAbstract
Flow cytometry is rapidly becoming a routine methodology in aquatic microbial ecology. The combination of simple to use bench-top flow cytometers and highly fluorescent nucleic acid stains allows fast and easy determination of microbe abundance in the plankton of lakes and oceans. The different dyes and protocols used to stain and count planktonic bacteria as well as the equipment in use are reviewed, with special attention to some of the problems encountered in daily routine practice such as fixation, staining and absolute counting. One of the main advantages of flow cytometry over epifluorescence microscopy is the ability to obtain cell-specific measurements in large numbers of cells with limited effort. We discuss how this characteristic has been used for differentiating photosynthetic from non-photosynthetic prokaryotes, for measuring bacterial cell size and nucleic acid content, and for estimating the relative activity and physiological state of each cell. We also describe how some of the flow cytometrically obtained data can be used to characterize the role of microbes on carbon cycling in the aquatic environment and we prospect the likely avenues of progress in the study of planktonic prokaryotes through the use of flow cytometry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biomass distribution in marine planktonic communities
Gasol, J. M., del Giorgio, P. A., & Duarte, C. M. (1997) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1353 · Cited by 391
Cited by
Zhu, L., Zhao, S., Bittar, T. B., Stubbins, A., & Li, D. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121065 · Cited by 394
Massana, R., DeLong, E. F., & Pedrós-Alió, C. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.5.1777-1787.2000 · Cited by 339
Past, present and future applications of flow cytometry in aquatic microbiology
Wang, Y., Hammes, F., De Roy, K., Verstraete, W., & Boon, N. (2010) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.04.006 · Cited by 247
Dissolved organic carbon leaching from microplastics and bioavailability in coastal ecosystems
Egea, L. G., Brun, F. G., & Jiménez-Ramos, R. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168673 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Gasol, J. M., & Del Giorgio, P. A.
- Venue
- Scientia Marina
- Publisher
- Editorial CSIC
- Published
- 2000-06-30
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-224
- ISSN
- 0214-8358 (ISSN-L)
- 1886-8134
- OpenAlex
- W1486479717
- Cited by
- 885
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using flow cytometry for counting natural planktonic bacteria and understanding the structure of planktonic bacterial communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3989/scimar.2000.64n2197
- The paper
- Gasol, J. M., & Del Giorgio, P. A. (2000). Using flow cytometry for counting natural planktonic bacteria and understanding the structure of planktonic bacterial communities. Scientia Marina. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2000.64n2197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.