The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Visibilidad e interpretación del registro arqueológico
Abstract
En este trabajo se plantea que los elementos que integran el registro arqueológico pueden ser definidos de acuerdo con las condiciones de visibilidad que manifiestan. Desde el punto de vista defendido en este trabajo, estas condiciones de visibilidad están determinadas por la concepción espacial implícita en la acción social que produce esos diferentes elementos. De este modo, se arguye que la descripción y análisis de las estrategias de visibilización existentes dentro de la acción social, pueden ser un recurso para interpretar el registro arqueológico y acceder a través de sus elementos al estudio de las diferentes racionalidades culturales que los generaron. En relación con este argumento principal, se discuten complementariamente los conceptos de Cultura Material y de Registro Arqueológico, además de revisar parcialmente la problemática de la interpretación en Arqueología y de proponer para solventar ésta la necesidad de contextualizar el análisis arqueológico sobre modelos explícitos de racionalidad cultural distintos a los nuestros. La formulación contenida en este trabajo se apura como contribución teórico-metodológica para la reconstrucción arqueológica de los paisajes sociales pretéritos.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“we decided to explore the two basic mechanisms through which space can be appropriated by means of human-embodied interaction: movement and vision (Criado Boado, 1993, de Certeau, 2000, Ingold and Vergunst, 2008).”
From Under the eye of the Apu. Paths and mountains in the Inka settlement of the Hualfín and Quimivil valleys, NW Argentina (2017) · cites this paper as Criado Boado, 1993
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- BINFORD, L. R. 1989: «Debating Archaeology». San Diego: Academic Press.
- BRADLEY, R. (1991): «Ritual, time and history» World Archaeology, 23 (2): 209-19.
- CRIADO BOADo, F. (1989a): «We, the post-megalithic peo- pie .. . ». In 1. Hodder (ed.): «The Meaning of Things. Material Culture and Symbolic Expression». London: Unwin Hyman: 79-89.
- -(1993a): «The visibility ofsocial action and the interpre- tation of material culture». In 1. Hodder y M. Shanks (eds.): «Interpretatives archaeologies», Oxford: Black- wells, en prensa.
- DERRIDA, J. (1976): «Of grammatology». Baltimore, Mary- land Johns Hopkins University Press (Paris, 1967).
- GOULO, S. J. (1992): «La flecha del tiempo. Mitos v metáforas en el descubrimiento del tiempo geológico». Madrid: Alianza Editorial, (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1987).
- HODDER, 1. (1982): .. Symbols in action. EthnoarchaeologicaJ studies ofmaterial culture». Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 229 pp. (6.2,14.3,17.1). -(1986): «Reading the pasto Current approaches to inter- pretation in archaeology». Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press -(1991): «Interpretive Archaeology and its role». American Antiquity, 56 (1): 7-18.
- INGOLD, T. (1980): «Hunters. pastoralists and ranchers». Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- -(1986): «The appropriation of nature. Essays on human ecologv and social relations». Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- -(1990): «Society, Nature and the concept ofTechnology». Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9 (1): 5-17.
- MADISON, G. B. (1990): «The Hermeneutics of Postmoder- nity». Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- OELSCHLAEGE, M. (1991): «The Idea of Wilderness. From Prehistorv to the Age of Ecology». New Haven: Yale University Press.
- PATRICK, L. E. (1985): «Is there an archaeological record? .. In Schiffer (ed.): Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, New York: Academic Press: 27-62.
- SHANIN, T. (1987): «Peasants and peasant societies». London: Penguin (2." edic., 1." edic. 1971).
- -(1990): «Defining peasants». Oxford: Blackwells.
- SHANKS, M. y TtLLEY, C. (1987): «Re-constructing archaeo- . logy». Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- SPERBER, D. (1985): .. On Anthropological Knowledge». Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (Paris: Her- mann, 1982).
- THOMAS, J. (1991): .. Rethinking the Neolithic». Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- TILLEY , C. (1990): .. Claude Lévi-Strauss: Structuralism and Beyond». In C. Tilley (ed.): Reading Material Culture. StructuraJism. Hermeneutics and Post-Structuralism. Ox- ford: Blackwell: 3-83.
- Felipe Criado Boado VICENT GARCIA, J . M. (1990): .. El Neolític: transformacions socials i economiques». En J . Anfruns y E. L10bet (eds.) : .. El canvi cultural a la Prehistoria», Barcelona: Columna: 241-93.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lynch, J., & Parcero-Oubiña, C. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.09.019 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Criado Boado, F.
- Venue
- Trabajos de Prehistoria
- Publisher
- Editorial CSIC
- Published
- 1993-12-30
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 39-56
- ISSN
- 1988-3218
- 0082-5638
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
