CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biometric score calibration for forensic face recognition

Ali, Tauseef·2014
DOI 10.3990/1.9789036536899
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3990/1.9789036536899

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In facial image comparison, studies did not take into account how different calibration characteristics such as features affect the results.

    “Although the process of calibration has been studied and analysed in speaker comparison works such as [28] or [31], [3] and in facial image comparison in [40] those studies in facial image comparison did not take into account how different calibration characteristics such as features affect the results.”

    From Calibration of score based likelihood ratio estimation in automated forensic facial image comparison (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 96

  1. A. K. Jain, P. Flynn, and A. Ross, Handbook of biometrics. Springer, 2007.
  2. C. Aitken, Statistics and evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists. John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
  3. D. R. Castro, Forensic evaluation of the evidence using automatic speaker recognition systems. PhD thesis, Universidad autónoma de Madrid, 2007.
  4. D. Meuwly, "Forensic individualisation from biometric data," Science & Justice, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 205-213, 2006.
  5. J. Buckleton, "A framework for interpreting evidence," in Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation (S. J. W. J. Buckleton, C.M. Triggs, ed.), pp. 27- 63, CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
  6. J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J. Fierrez-Aguilar, D. Ramos-Castro, and J. Ortega-Garcia, "Bayesian analysis of fingerprint, face and signature evidences with automatic biometric systems," Forensic science interna- tional, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 126-140, 2005.
  7. C. Champod and D. Meuwly, "The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition," Speech Communication, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 193- 203, 2000.
  8. D. Ramos and J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, "Reliable support: Measuring calibration of likelihood ratios," Forensic science international, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 156-169, 2013.
  9. A. B. Hepler, C. P. Saunders, L. J. Davis, and J. Buscaglia, "Score- based likelihood ratios for handwriting evidence," Forensic science in- ternational, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 129-140, 2012.
  10. C. M. Bishop et al., Pattern recognition and machine learning, vol. 1. springer New York, 2006.
  11. G. S. Morrison, F. Ochoa, and T. Thiruvaran, "Database selection for forensic voice comparison," in Proceedings of Odyssey, pp. 62-77, 2012.
  12. I. Alberink, A. Jongh, and C. Rodriguez, "Fingermark evidence eval- uation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: The effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios," Journal of forensic sciences, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 70-81, 2014.
  13. D. Ramos-Castro, J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A. Montero-Asenjo, and J. Ortega-Garcia, "Suspect-adapted MAP estimation of within-source distributions in generative likelihood ratio estimation," in Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, 2006. IEEE Odyssey 2006: The, pp. 1- 5, 2006.
  14. T. Ali, L. Spreeuwers, R. Veldhuis, and D. Meuwly, "Effect of calibra- tion data on forensic likelihood ratio from a face recognition system," in proceedings of IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems, BTAS, pp. 1-8, 2013.
  15. D. Ramos, J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, G. Zadora, and C. Aitken, "Information-theoretical assessment of the performance of likelihood ra- tio computation methods," Journal of forensic sciences, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1503-1518, 2013.
  16. N. Brümmer and J. du Preez, "Application-independent evaluation of speaker detection," Computer Speech & Language, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 230-275, 2006.
  17. C. Tippett, V. Emerson, M. Fereday, F. Lawton, A. Richardson, L. Jones, and M. S. Lampert, "The evidential value of the comparison of paint flakes from sources other than vehicles," Journal of the Forensic Science Society, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 61-65, 1968.
  18. T. Ali, L. Spreeuwers, and R. Veldhuis, "Towards automatic forensic face recognition," in Informatics Engineering and Information Science, pp. 47-55, Springer, 2011.
  19. C. Peacock, A. Goode, and A. Brett, "Automatic forensic face recogni- tion from digital images," Science & Justice, pp. 29-34, 2004.
  20. T. Ali, P. Tom, J. Fierrez, R. Vera-Rodriguez, L. Spreeuwers, and R. Veldhuis, "A study of identification performance of facial regions from CCTV images," in 5th International Workshop on Computational Forensics, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 1-9, 2012.
  21. P. Tome, J. Fierrez, R. Vera-Rodriguez, and D. Ramos, "Identification using face regions: Application and assessment in forensic scenarios," Forensic science international, vol. 233, no. 1, pp. 75-83, 2013.
  22. L. Wiskott, J.-M. Fellous, N. Kruger, , and C. von der Malsburg, "Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching," IEEE Transactions on PAMI, pp. 775-779, 1997.
  23. F. Wang, J. Wang, C. Zhang, and J. T. Kwok, "Face recognition using spectral features," Pattern Recognition, pp. 2786-2797, 2007.
  24. W. Zhao, R. Chellappa, P. J. Phillips, and A. Rosenfeld, "Face recogni- tion: A literature survey," ACM Computing Surveys, pp. 399-458, 2003.
  25. P. J. Phillips, W. T. Scruggs, A. J. O' Toole, P. J. Flynn, K. W. Bowyer, C. L. Schott, and M. Sharpe, "FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 large-scale results," National Institute of Standards and Technology, vol. 7408, 2007.
  26. C. Champod and D. Meuwly, "The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition," Speech Communication, vol. 31, pp. 193-203, 2000.
  27. J. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J. Fierrez-Aguilar, and J. Ortega-Garcia, "Forensic identification reporting using automatic speaker recognition systems," in Proc. ICASSP, 2003.
  28. M. Y. Aulsebrook, W. A. Iscan, and J. H. Slabbert, "Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey," Forensic Science International, vol. 75, pp. 101-102, 1995.
  29. C. Wilkinson and R. Neave, "Skull re-assembly and the implications for forensic facial reconstruction," Science & Justice, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 233- 234, 2001.
  30. A. Samal and P. A. Iyengar, "Automatic recognition and analysis of human faces and facial expressions: A survey," Pattern Recognition, pp. 65-77, 1992.
  31. N. A. Spaun, "Forensic biometrics from images and video at the federal bureau of investigation," in Proc. BTAS, pp. 1-3, 2007.
  32. D. Alspaugh, A brief history of photogrammetry, pp. 1-14. 2004.
  33. N. A. Spaun, "Facial comparisons by subject matter experts: Their role in biometrics and their training," in Proc. ICB, pp. 161-168, 2009.
  34. D. Meuwly, "Forensic individualization from biometric data," Science & Justice, pp. 205-213, 2006.
  35. T. Cootes, G. Edwards, and C. Taylor, "Active appearance models," IEEE Transactions on PAMI, pp. 681-685, 2001.
  36. U. Park and A. K. Jain, "Face matching and retrieval using soft biomet- rics," IEEE Transactions on Information Forensic and Security (TIFS), pp. 406-415, 2010.
  37. M. Turk and A. Pentland, "Eigenfaces for recognition," Journal of Cog- nitive Neuroscience, pp. 71-86, 1991.
  38. J. Phillips, H. Wechsler, J. S. Huang, and P. Rauss, "The Feret database and evaluation procedure for face recognition algorithms," Image and Vision Computing, pp. 295-306, 1998.
  39. F. Botti, A. Alexander, and A. Drygajlo, "An interpretation framework for the evaluation of evidence in forensic automatic speaker recognition with limited suspect data," in ODYSSEY04-The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, 2004.
  40. T. Ali, L. Spreeuwers, and R. Veldhuis, "A review of calibration methods for biometric systems in forensic applications," in 33rd WIC Symposium on Information Theory in the Benelux, Netherlands, pp. 126-133, 2012.
  41. C. G. Aitken, F. Taroni, and J. Wiley, Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists, vol. 10. Wiley Online Library, 2004.
  42. G. Morrison, "Forensic voice comparison," in Expert Evidence (I. Freckel- ton and H. Selby, eds.), pp. Ch-99, Thomson Reuters, Sydney, Australia, 2010.
  43. C. Peacock, A. Goode, and A. Brett, "Automatic forensic face recogni- tion from digital images," Science & Justice, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 29-34, 2004.
  44. E. Parzen et al., "On estimation of a probability density function and mode," Annals of mathematical statistics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1065-1076, 1962.
  45. B. W. Silverman, Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, vol. 26. CRC press, 1986.
  46. D. Meuwly and A. Drygajlo, "Forensic speaker recognition based on a bayesian framework and gaussian mixture modelling (gmm)," in 2001: A Speaker Odyssey-The Speaker Recognition Workshop, 2001.
  47. A. Agresti, "Building and applying logistic regression models," Categor- ical Data Analysis, Second Edition, pp. 211-266, 2002.
  48. B. Zadrozny and C. Elkan, "Learning and making decisions when costs and probabilities are both unknown," in Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 204-213, ACM, 2001.
  49. T. Fawcett and A. Niculescu-Mizil, "PAV and the ROC convex hull," Machine Learning, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 97-106, 2007.
  50. M. I. Mandasari, M. McLaren, and D. A. van Leeuwen, "The effect of noise on modern automatic speaker recognition systems," in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), International Conference on, pp. 4249-4252, IEEE, 2012.
  51. Y. Tang and S. N. Srihari, "Likelihood ratio estimation in forensic iden- tification using similarity and rarity," Pattern Recognition, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 945-958, 2014.
  52. G. Zadora, "Evaluation of evidence value of glass fragments by likeli- hood ratio and bayesian network approaches," Analytica chimica acta, vol. 642, no. 1, pp. 279-290, 2009.
  53. T. Grant, "Quantifying evidence in forensic authorship analysis.," In- ternational Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, vol. 14, no. 1, 2007.
  54. P. Rose, "Technical forensic speaker recognition: Evaluation, types and testing of evidence," Computer Speech & Language, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 159-191, 2006.
  55. C. Neumann, I. Evett, and J. Skerrett, "Quantifying the weight of evi- dence from a forensic fingerprint comparison: a new paradigm," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 371-415, 2012.
  56. G. S. Morrison, "Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems," Science & Justice, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 91-98, 2011.
  57. J. Curran, J. Buckleton, C. Triggs, and B. Weir, "Assessing uncertainty in DNA evidence caused by sampling effects," Science & justice, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 29-37, 2002.
  58. G. W. Beecham and B. S. Weir, "Confidence interval of the likelihood ratio associated with mixed stain DNA evidence," Journal of forensic sciences, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 166-171, 2011.
  59. C. Agostinelli and L. Greco, "A weighted strategy to handle likelihood uncertainty in bayesian inference," Computational Statistics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 319-339, 2013.
  60. D. V. Lindley, Understanding uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  61. G. S. Morrison, C. Zhang, and P. Rose, "An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system," Forensic science international, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 59-65, 2011.
  62. G. S. Morrison, "A comparison of procedures for the calculation of foren- sic likelihood ratios from acoustic-phonetic data: Multivariate kernel density (MVKD) versus gaussian mixture model-universal background model (GMM-UBM)," Speech Communication, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 242- 256, 2011.
  63. L. J. Davis, C. P. Saunders, A. Hepler, and J. Buscaglia, "Using sub- sampling to estimate the strength of handwriting evidence via score- based likelihood ratios," Forensic science international, vol. 216, no. 1, pp. 146-157, 2012.
  64. G. S. Morrison, "Tutorial on logistic-regression calibration and fusion: Converting a score to a likelihood ratio," Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 173-197, 2013.
  65. R. Chartrand and W. Yin, "Iteratively reweighted algorithms for com- pressive sensing," in Acoustics, speech and signal processing, IEEE in- ternational conference on, pp. 3869-3872, IEEE, 2008.
  66. J. Platt et al., "Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods," Advances in large mar- gin classifiers, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 61-74, 1999.
  67. J. Lu, K. N. Plataniotis, A. N. Venetsanopoulos, and S. Z. Li, "Ensemble- based discriminant learning with boosting for face recognition," Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 166-178, 2006.
  68. M. Grgic, K. Delac, and S. Grgic, "SCface-surveillance cameras face database," Multimedia tools and applications, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 863- 879, 2011.
  69. D. Lucy, Introduction to statistics for forensic scientists. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
  70. A. Nordgaard and T. Höglund, "Assessment of approximate likelihood ratios from continuous distributions: A case study of digital camera identification," Journal of forensic sciences, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 390-402, 2011.
  71. F. Botti, A. Alexander, and A. Drygajlo, "An interpretation framework for the evaluation of evidence in forensic automatic speaker recognition with limited suspect data," in ODYSSEY04-The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, 2004.
  72. P. J. Phillips, P. J. Flynn, T. Scruggs, K. W. Bowyer, J. Chang, K. Hoff- man, J. Marques, J. Min, and W. Worek, "Overview of the face recogni- tion grand challenge," in Computer vision and pattern recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE computer society conference on, vol. 1, pp. 947-954, IEEE, 2005.
  73. D. Meuwly and R. Veldhuis, "Forensic biometrics: From two commu- nities to one discipline," in In proceedings: Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG), pp. 1-12, IEEE, 2012.
  74. A. F. Abate, M. Nappi, D. Riccio, and G. Sabatino, "2D and 3D face recognition: A survey," Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 1885-1906, 2007.
  75. W. Zhao, R. Chellappa, P. J. Phillips, and A. Rosenfeld, "Face recog- nition: A literature survey," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 399-458, 2003.
  76. P. N. Belhumeur, J. P. Hespanha, and D. Kriegman, "Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection," Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 711-720, 1997. Bibliography
  77. J. Lu, K. N. Plataniotis, and A. N. Venetsanopoulos, "Boosting linear discriminant analysis for face recognition," in Proceedings of IEEE ICIP, vol. 1, pp. I-657, IEEE, 2003.
  78. S. G. Kong, J. Heo, B. R. Abidi, J. Paik, and M. A. Abidi, "Recent advances in visual and infrared face recognition: a review," Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 103-135, 2005.
  79. R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, Pattern classification. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
  80. Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire, "A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting," Journal of computer and system sciences, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 119-139, 1997.
  81. S. J. Raudys and A. K. Jain, "Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: Recommendations for practitioners," IEEE Trans- actions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 252-264, 1991.
  82. S. Lewis, "Philosophy of speaker identification. police applications of speech and tape recording analysis," Proceeding of the Institute of Acous- tics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 69-77, 1984.
  83. P. Viola and M. J. Jones, "Robust real-time face detection," Interna- tional journal of computer vision, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 137-154, 2004.
  84. K. J. Kirchberg, O. Jesorsky, and R. W. Frischholz, "Genetic model op- timization for hausdorff distance-based face localization," in Biometric Authentication, pp. 103-111, Springer, 2002.
  85. R. Wallace, M. McLaren, C. McCool, and S. Marcel, "Cross-pollination of normalization techniques from speaker to face authentication using gaussian mixture models," Information Forensics and Security, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 553-562, 2012.
  86. S. J. Prince and J. H. Elder, "Probabilistic linear discriminant analysis for inferences about identity," in Proceedings of 11th ICCV, pp. 1-8, IEEE, 2007.
  87. W. Zhang, S. Shan, W. Gao, X. Chen, and H. Zhang, "Local gabor binary pattern histogram sequence (LGBPHS): A novel non-statistical model for face representation and recognition," in Proceedings of ICCV, vol. 1, pp. 786-791, IEEE, 2005.
  88. W. Zhao, A. Krishnaswamy, R. Chellappa, D. L. Swets, and J. Weng, "Discriminant analysis of principal components for face recognition," in Face Recognition, pp. 73-85, Springer, 1998.
  89. R. Wallace, M. McLaren, C. McCool, and S. Marcel, "Inter-session vari- ability modelling and joint factor analysis for face authentication," in Biometrics (IJCB), 2011 International Joint Conference on, pp. 1-8, IEEE, 2011.
  90. L. Wiskott, J.-M. Fellous, N. Kuiger, and C. Von Der Malsburg, "Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching," Pattern Analysis and Ma- chine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 775-779, 1997.
  91. B. Moghaddam, "Principal manifolds and probabilistic subspaces for visual recognition," Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 780-788, 2002.
  92. P. J. Phillips, J. R. Beveridge, B. A. Draper, G. Givens, A. J. O'Toole, D. S. Bolme, J. Dunlop, Y. M. Lui, H. Sahibzada, and S. Weimer, "An introduction to the good, the bad, & the ugly face recognition chal- lenge problem," in Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition and Work- shops (FG 2011), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 346-353, IEEE, 2011.
  93. Y. M. Lui, D. Bolme, P. J. Phillips, J. R. Beveridge, and B. A. Draper, "Preliminary studies on the good, the bad, and the ugly face recognition challenge problem," in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Work- shops (CVPRW), 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, pp. 9-16, IEEE, 2012.
  94. M. Günther, R. Wallace, and S. Marcel, "An open source framework for standardized comparisons of face recognition algorithms," in Com- puter Vision-ECCV 2012. Workshops and Demonstrations, pp. 547-556, Springer, 2012.
  95. A. Anjos, L. E. Shafey, R. Wallace, M. Günther, C. McCool, and S. Marcel, "Bob: a free signal processing and machine learning tool- box for researchers," in 20th ACM Conference on Multimedia Systems (ACMMM), Nara, Japan, ACM Press, Oct. 2012.
  96. T. Ali, L. Spreeuwers, and R. Veldhuis, "Computation of likelihood ratio from small sample set of within-source variability," in European Academy Bibliography of Forensic Science conference, European Academy of Forensic Science, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ali, T.
Publisher
University Library/University of Twente
Published
2014
DOI
10.3990/1.9789036536899
Cited by
1
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review