CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Open Online Assessment Management System Platform and Instrument to Enhance the Information, Media, and ICT Literacy Skills of 21st Century Learners

Khlaisang, Jintavee, Koraneekij, Prakob·2019·International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)
DOI 10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9953
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Information literacy (IL), media literacy (ML), and information communication and technology literacy (ICT Literacy: ICTL) are some of the most important skills for 21st century learning and which help promote other skills, including life and career skills and learning and innovation skills. This kind of learning allows students to connect as a learning network without barriers or borders. It fully supports the use of equipment and technology to develop the skills necessary for life. The purpose of this research study is two-fold: first, to develop a research-based Open Online Assessment Management System (OOAMS), and second to develop the standardized measurement for an assessment of IL, ML, and ICTL for higher education learners. The sample group consists of 2,300 higher educa-tion learners and the methodology was divided into 3 phases: (1) developing the conceptual framework, definition, and features of IL, ML, and ICTL for higher education learners; (2) examining requirements, designing wireframes, and de-veloping an OOAMS for higher education students; and (3) testing the quality of OOAMS for IL, ML, and ICTL using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmation factor analysis (CFA) statistical methods. The research result found that, first, the specific features of the system included development using PHP and MySQL database and the design to interact with users with a responsive UI framework. The system is compatible with MOOCs and the Open edX platform, or can be used as a stand-alone application. It can create, share, copy, and extend both Likert scales and rubrics evaluation forms. It can also generate reports in both CSV and PDF formats. Secondly, the results of this research provided a standardized measurement for assessing IL (49 items), ML (63 items), and ICTL (69 items). Also, it can be improved or enhanced for online learning in a ubiqui-tous learning context such as e-learning, blended learning, virtual learning and MOOCs effectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9953

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Guo, Y., Zhang, M., Bonk, C.J., and Li, Y. (2015). Chinese Faculty Members' Open Educa- tional Resources (OER) Usage Status and the Barriers to OER Development and Usage. In- ternational Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 10(5): 59-65. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i5.4819 · DOI
  2. Khlaisang, J. and Koraneekij, P. (2018). Development and Validation of the Online Assess- ment Management System for 21st Century Learners. Proceeding of the 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma De Mallorca, Spain, JU- LY 2018. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018.0977 · DOI
  3. Miller, J.L. (2015). Educational Technology Bridging the Gap Between Youth and Adult Learners of the 21st Century. Adult Education Research Conference.
  4. Khlaisang, J. and Likhitdamrongkiat, M. (2015). E-Learning System in Blended Learning Environment to Enhance Cognitive Skills for Learners in Higher Education. Procedia -So- cial and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 759-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.612 · DOI
  5. Moto, S., Ratanaolarn, T., Tuntiwongwanich, S., Pimdee, P. (2018). A Thai Junior High School Students' 21st Century Information Literacy, Media Literacy, and ICT Literacy Skills Factor Analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(9), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8355 · DOI
  6. Khlaisang, J., Mingsiritham, K. (2016). Engaging virtual learning environment system to enhance communication and collaboration skills among ASEAN higher education learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5503 · DOI
  7. Prema P., Nedungadi, R. M., Georg G., Lynnea E., Raghu R., (2018). Towards an inclusive digital literacy framework for digital India, Education + Training, 60(6), 516-528. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2018-0061 https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2018-0061 · DOI
  8. Dezuanni,M. (2018). Minecraft and children's digital making: implications for media litera- cy education, Learning, Media and Technology, 43:3, 236-249, DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2018.1472607 https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1472607 · DOI
  9. Porat, E., Blau, I., and Barak, A. (2018). Measuring digital literacies: Junior high-school students' perceived competencies versus actual performance. Computers & Education. 126 (November 2018), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.030 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Wray, C.C. and Mulvihill, R. (2018). Framing Up Digital Literacy: Reviewing and Refram- ing Information Literacy Modules, The Reference Librarian, 59:4, 195-204, DOI: 10.1080/02763877.2018.1498431 https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2018.1498431 · DOI
  11. The London School of Economics and Political Science. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies Invited for The Communica- tion Review. Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
  12. Literacy between Teachers and Students in Iran's Secondary Schools. World Applied Sci- ences Journal, 4(3), 396-405.
  13. Katz, I. R. and Macklin, A. S. (2007). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy: Integration and Assessment in Higher Education. Retrieved November 15, 2010, from http://www.iiisci.org/Journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/p890541.pdf
  14. Stratling, R. (2017). The Complementary use of audience response systems and online tests to implement repeat testing: A case study, British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 370-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12362 · DOI
  15. Thompson, M. M., and Braude, E. J. (2016). Evaluation of Knowla:An Online Assessment and Learning Tool. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(4), 483-512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115621923 · DOI
  16. Shin, S. and Hashimoto, H. (2014). A System for the automatic assembly of test questions using a no-sql database, International Conference of e-Learning 2014.
  17. Koong, C.S. and Wu, C.Y. (2010). An interactive item sharing website for creating and con- ducting on-line testing. Computers & Education. 55, 131-144. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.compedu.2009.12.010 · DOI
  18. Lee, J., Park, S., and Kim, K. (2012). Web-based adaptive testing system (WATS) for classi- fying students' academic ability. Turkish online Journal of Distance Education, 13(4), 25- 35.
  19. Rosman, T., Mayer, A.K., and Krampen, G. (2015). Combining self-assessments and achievement tests in information literacy assessment: empirical results and recommenda- tions for practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), pp. 740-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.950554 · DOI
  20. Edwards, F. (2017). A rubric to track the development of secondary preservice and novice teachers' summative assessment literacy, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(2), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1245651 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Khlaisang, J., & Koraneekij, P.
ORCID
Khlaisang, Jintavee
Venue
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)
Publisher
International Association of Online Engineering (IAOE)
Published
2019-04-11
Volume
14
Issue
07
Pages
111
ISSN
1863-0383
DOI
10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9953
Cited by
17
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review