The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mineralization Worked Examples for the TEA and LCA Guidelines for CO2 Utilization
Abstract
This document contains worked examples of how to apply the accompanying “Guideline for Techno-Economic Assessment of CO2 Utilization” and “Guideline for Life Cycle Assessment of CO2 Utilization”. The Guidelines can be downloaded via http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/145436. These worked examples are not intended to be a definitive TEA or LCA report on the process described, but are provided as supporting material to show how the TEA and LCA methodologies described in the guidelines can be specifically applied to tackle the issues surrounding CO2 utilization. This document contains worked examples of how to apply the accompanying “Guideline for Techno- Economic Assessment of CO2 Utilization” and “Guideline for Life Cycle Assessment of CO2 Utilization”, hereafter referred to as "the TEA and LCA guidelines". These worked examples are not intended to be a definitive TEA or LCA report on the process described, but are provided as supporting material to show how the TEA and LCA methodologies described in the guidelines can be specifically applied to tackle the issues surrounding CO2 utilization. This example was constructed using data collected from a demonstration plant operated by Carbon8 Systems in Ontario, Canada, together with data obtained from the literature and from the ecoinvent database v3.4. As with the methanol worked example, the aim is not to prove whether the selected process is economically or environmentally viable or to make process alterations to make it so, but to c…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The McCord et al., 2018 interpretation of TEA for CCUSbased production of secondary aggregates from APCr concludes that the production cost is high for a fixed plant producing 4,500 metric tons per year.”
From Mineralization Technology for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (2020) · cites this paper as McCord et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Perry's chemical engineers' handbook
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-4393 · Cited by 10,121
Plant design and economics for chemical engineers
Peters, M. S., & Timmerhaus, K. D. (1958) · Cited by 4,067
Analysis, synthesis, and design of chemical processes
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-0974 · Cited by 3,433
Accelerated carbonation treatment of industrial wastes
Gunning, P. J., Hills, C. D., & Carey, P. J. (2010) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.005 · Cited by 217
Self-citationQuina, M. J., Bordado, J. C., & Quinta-Ferreira, R. M. (2013) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.014 · Cited by 51
LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BRICK AND MORTAR PRODUCTS
Venta, G. J., & Eng, P. (1998) · Cited by 34
Bahor, B., Brunt, M. V., Weitz, K. A., & Szurgot, A. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000189 · Cited by 19
Some independent assessments of the SEALOSAFE/STABLEX method for toxic waste treatment
Chappell, C. L., & Willetts, S. L. (1980) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/0304-3894(80)80001-x · Cited by 5
Lin‐Heng, L., Neo, H., Kondepudi, S. N., Yew, W.-S., & Sng, J. G.-K. (2017) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/10706 · Cited by 4
Cited by
Mineralization Technology for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage
Hills, C. D., Tripathi, N., & Carey, P. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00142 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Publisher
- Global CO2 Initiative@UM
- Published
- 2018
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 9
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.