The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2019: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-60
Open accessAbstract
A latent class analysis of heavy substance use in young adulthood and impacts on physical, cognitive, and mental health outcomes in middle age ......
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical studies that examined stimulant therapy for ADHD and subsequent risk for SUD suffer from limitations such as small homogeneous samples, non-random sampling, and lack of attention toward both non-stimulant and stimulant therapy for ADHD.
“Although clinical studies have examined stimulant therapy for ADHD and subsequent risk for SUD, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36] these studies suffer from limitations such as small homogeneous samples, non-random sampling, and lack of attention toward both non-stimulant and stimulant therapy for ADHD.”
From Is Age of Onset and Duration of Stimulant Therapy for ADHD Associated with Cocaine, Methamphetamine, and Prescription Stimulant Misuse? (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- See also: Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Humphrey, R. H. (1988). Explaining the recent decline in marijuana use: Differentiating the effects of perceived risks, disapproval, and general lifestyle factors. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 29, 92-112;
- Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O'Malley, P. M. (1990). Explaining the recent decline in cocaine use among young adults: Further evidence that perceived risks and disapproval lead to reduced drug use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 173-184;
- Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O'Malley, P. M. (1998). Explaining recent increases in students' marijuana use: Impacts of perceived risks and disapproval, 1976 through 1996. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 887-892;
- Johnston, L. D. (1981). Characteristics of the daily marijuana user. In R. de Silva, R. L. DuPont, & G. K. Russell (Eds.), Treating the marijuana-dependent person (pp. 12-15). New York: The American Council on Marijuana;
- Johnston, L. D. (1985). The etiology and prevention of substance use: What can we learn from recent historical changes? In C. L. Jones & R. J. Battjes (Eds.), Etiology of drug abuse: Implications for prevention (NIDA Research Monograph No. 56, DHHS Publication No. ADM 85 1335, pp. 155-177).
- Keyes, K. M., Schulenberg, J. E., O'Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., Li, G., & Hasin, D. (2011).The social norms of birth cohorts and adolescent marijuana use in the United States, 1976-2007. Addiction, 106(10), 1790-1800.
- Patrick, M. E., & Terry-McElrath, Y. M. (2017). High-intensity drinking by underage young adults in the United States. Addiction, 112, 82-93. · DOI
- Patrick, M. E., Terry-McElrath, Y. M., Kloska, D. D., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2016). High-intensity drinking among young adults in the United States: Prevalence, frequency, and developmental change. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 40, 1905-1912. · DOI
- Patrick, M. E., Terry-McElrath, Y. M., Miech, R. A., Schulenberg, J. E., O'Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2017). Age-specific prevalence of binge and high-intensity drinking among U.S. young adults: Changes from 2005 to 2015. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 41, 1319-1328. 8th Grade 18.7 20.6 22.5 25.7 28.5 31.2 29.4 29.0 28.3 26.8 26.8 24.5 22.8 21.5 21.4 20.9 19.0 19.6 19.9 21.4 20.1 18.5 ‡ 21.1 20.3 20.5 17.2 18.2 18.7 20.4 +1.7 10th Grade 30.6 29.8 32.8 37.4 40.9 45.4 47.3 44.9 46.2 45.6 45.6 44.6 41.4 39.8 38.2 36.1 35.6 34.1 36.0 37.0 37.7 36.8 ‡ 39.1 37.4 34.7 33.7 34.3 36.3 37.5 +1.2 12th Grade 44.1 40.7 42.9 45.6 48.4 50.8 54.3 54.1 54.7 54.0 53.9 53.0 51.1 51.1 50.4 48.2 46.8 47.4 46.7 48.2 49.9 49.1 ‡ 49.8 49.1 48.9 48.3 48.9 47.8 47.4 -0.4 College Students 50.4 48.8 45.9 45.5 45.5 47.4 49.0 52.9 53.2 53.7 53.6 51.8 53.9 52.2 52.3 50.6 50.5 49.5 51.4 49.1 49.2 50.5 ‡ 53.3 52.4 53.4 54.4 55.5 55.7 58.9 +3.2 Young Adults 62.2 60.2 59.6 57.5 57.4 56.4 56.7 57.0 57.4 58.2 58.1 59.0 60.2 60.5 60.4 59.7 59.8 59.3 59.3 58.4 59.1 58.9 ‡ 60.0 62.2 62.9 62.9 64.1 63.9 66.5 +2.6 s 8th Grade 14.3 15.6 16.8 17.5 18.8 19.2 17.7 16.9 16.3 15.8 ‡ 17.0 13.7 13.6 12.2 12.1 12.2 11.1 11.2 10.4 10.6 9.8 8.7 ‡ 10.4 10.0 10.3 8.9 9.3 9.8 10.8 +1.0 10th Grade 19.1 19.2 20.9 21.7 24.3 25.5 25.0 23.6 24.0 23.1 ‡ 23.6 22.1 19.7 18.8 18.0 17.5 18.2 15.9 16.7 16.8 15.6 14.9 ‡ 16.4 15.9 14.6 14.0 13.7 14.2 13.8 -0.4 12th Grade 26.9 25.1 26.7 27.6 28.1 28.5 30.0 29.4 29.4 29.0 ‡ 30.7 29.5 27.7 28.7 27.4 26.9 25.5 24.9 24.0 24.7 24.9 24.1 ‡ 24.8 22.6 21.1 20.7 19.5 18.9 18.4 -0.6 College Students 25.8 26.1 24.3 22.0 24.5 22.7 24.4 24.8 25.5 25.8 ‡ 26.3 26.9 27.6 28.0 26.5 26.3 25.3 22.6 25.6 24.8 24.3 23.8 ‡ 28.3 29.0 26.4 26.5 26.3 27.3 26.2 -1.1 Young Adults 37.8 37.0 34.6 33.4 32.8 31.0 30.5 29.9 30.2 31.3 ‡ 31.6 32.8 33.9 35.2 34.0 34.8 34.2 34.7 32.8 33.3 33.2 32.8 ‡ 34.0 37.3 36.8 36.3 37.0 36.5 36.7 +0.2 including Inhalants a,c,d 8th Grade 28.5 29.6 32.3 35.1 38.1 39.4 38.1 37.8 37.2 35.1 34.5 31.6 30.3 30.2 30.0 29.2 27.7 28.3 27.9 28.6 26.4 40.0 ‡ 25.9 25.2 24.9 20.6 23.3 23.2 25.4 +2.2 10th Grade 36.1 36.2 38.7 42.7 45.9 49.8 50.9 49.3 49.9 49.3 48.8 47.7 44.9 43.1 42.1 40.1 39.8 38.7 40.0 40.6 40.8 25.1 ‡ 41.6 40.4 37.2 35.9 37.0 38.7 39.8 +1.1 12th Grade 47.6 44.4 46.6 49.1 51.5 53.5 56.3 56.1 56.3 57.0 56.0 54.6 52.8 53.0 53.5 51.2 49.1 49.3 48.4 49.9 51.8 50.3 ‡ 52.3 49.9 51.4 49.3 50.3 49.0 49.1 +0.1 College Students 52.0 50.3 49.1 47.0 47.0 49.1 50.7 55.4 54.4 54.6 53.1 52.3 54.1 52.9 53.9 53.3 52.5 51.0 51.1 50.0 49.7 52.0 ‡ 53.3 51.8 52.0 52.6 53.3 55.5 58.4 +2.8 Young Adults 63.4 61.2 61.2 58.5 59.0 58.2 58.4 58.5 58.5 59.5 59.0 59.6 60.6 62.5 61.4 61.2 61.2 60.2 59.3 59.3 59.5 59.5 ‡ 62.2 60.6 61.0 61.4 61.7 63.5 66.1 +2.6 8th Grade 10.2 11.2 12.6 16.7 19.9 23.1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McCabe, S. E., Figueroa, O., McCabe, V. V., Schepis, T. S., Schulenberg, J. E., Veliz, P. T., Werner, K. S., & Wilens, T. E. (2024) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13807 · Cited by 22
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schulenberg, J., & Johnston, L.
- Publisher
- Institute for Social Research
- Published
- 2020
- OpenAlex
- W2916025045
- Cited by
- 1,054
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 169 · 2021: 183 · 2020: 194
- FWCI
- 182.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Keywords
- drug use, substance use trends, university students, young adults, adolescents, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, illicit drug use, cannabis use, nicotine use, opioid use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
