The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Is the Mind a Magic Trick? Illusionism about Consciousness in the “Consciousness-Only” Theory of Vasubandhu and Sthiramati
Open accessAbstract
Illusionists about consciousness boldly argue that phenomenal consciousness does not fundamentally exist—it only seems to exist. For them, the impression of having a private inner life of conscious qualia is nothing more than a cognitive error, a conjuring trick put on by a purely physical brain. Some phenomenal realists have accused illusionism of being a byproduct of modern Western scientism and overzealous naturalism. However, Jay Garfield has endorsed illusionism by explicitly drawing support from the classical Yogācāra Buddhist philosopher Vasubandhu. In this paper, I assess the degree to which Garfield’s illusionist interpretation accurately captures the views of Vasubandhu and his commentator Sthiramati in their extant Sanskrit works. As it turns out, Vasubandhu and Sthiramati converge with contemporary illusionists in taking an unconscious causal basis of cognitive/linguistic processes to be responsible for generating the illusion of representational states with apparently phenomenal contents. Within their constitutive understanding of the mind as the “imagination of what is non-existent” (abhūtaparikalpa), I raise possible candidates for what might seem to be real instances of phenomenality—mental appearances (pratibhāsa), affective sensory experience (vedanā), and “intrinsic luminosity” (prakṛtiprabhāsvara)—and consider possible responses on behalf of an illusionist interpreter. I conclude that Vasubandhu and Sthiramati really do appear to be strong illusionists about phenomenal consciousness, particularly if phenomenal states are assumed to be essentially representational.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 12
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- Anālayo, Bhikkhu, 2017, The Luminous Mind in Theravāda and Dharmaguptaka Discourses, Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies, 13, 10
- Balog, Katalin, 2016, Illusionism’s Discontent, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23, 40
- Bodhi, Bhikkhu, 2000, The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Saṃyutta Nikāya
- Brunnhölzl, Karl, 2019, A Compendium of the Mahāyāna: Asaṅga’s Mahāyānasaṃgraha and its Indian and Tibetan Commentaries
- Buescher, Harmut, 2007, Sthiramati’s Triṃśikāvijñaptibhāṣya
- Chalmers, David J., 2010, The Character of Consciousness, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311105.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Cox, Collett, 1995, Disputed Dharmas: Early Buddhist Theories on Existence: An Annotated Translation of the Section on Factors Dissociated from Thought from Saṅghabhadra’s Nyāyānusāra
- Crane, Tim, 2001, Elements of Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind
- Dennett, Daniel C.Anthony J. MarcelEdoardo Bisiach, 1988, Consciousness in Contemporary Science, 42
- Dennett, Daniel C., 1991, Consciousness Explained
- Dennett, Daniel C., 1996, Kinds of Minds: Toward an Understanding of Consciousness
- Dennett, Daniel C., 2016, Illusionism as the Obvious Default Theory of Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23, 65
- Dennett, Daniel C., 2017, From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds
- Frankish, Keith, 2012, Quining Diet Qualia, Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 667, 10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.001 · DOI
- Frankish, Keith, 2016a, Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23, 11
- Frankish, Keith, 2016b, Not Disillusioned: Reply to Commentators, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23, 256
- Garfield, Jay L., 2002, Empty Words: Buddhist Philosophy and Cross-Cultural Interpretation
- Garfield, Jay L., 2015, Engaging Buddhism: Why It Matters to Philosophy, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190204334.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Garfield, Jay L., 2016, Illusionism and Givenness, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23, 73
- Goff, Philip, 2016, Is Realism About Consciousness Compatible with a Scientifically Respectable Worldview?, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23, 83
- Graham, GeorgeTerence HorganEdmond Wright, 2008, The Case for Qualia, 89
- Graziano, Michael S. A., 2016, Consciousness Engineered, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23, 98
- Graziano, Michael S. A., 2019, Rethinking Consciousness: A Scientific Theory of Subjective Experience
- Graziano, Michael S. A., 2020, Consciousness and the Attention Schema: Why It Has to be Right, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37, 224, 10.1080/02643294.2020.1761782 · DOI
- Graziano, Michael S. A.Arvid GuterstamBranden J. BioAndrew I. Wilterson, 2020, Toward a Standard Model of Consciousness: Reconciling the Attention Schema, Global Workspace, Higher-Order Thought, and Illusionist Theories, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37, 155
- Huebner, BryceEyal AvivSonam KachruItay ShaniSusanne K. Beiweis, 2022, Cross-Cultural Approaches to Consciousness: Mind, Nature, and Ultimate Reality, 223
- Humphrey, Nicholas, 2011, Soul Dust: The Magic of Consciousness, 10.1515/9781400838073 · DOI
- Humphrey, Nicholas, 2016, Redder Than Red: Illusionism or Phenomenal Surrealism?, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23, 116
- Irvine, ElizabethMark SprevakUriah Kriegel, 2020, Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness, 348
- Kachru, Sonam, 2021, Other Lives: Mind and World in Indian Buddhism, 10.7312/kach20000 · DOI · Paper page
- Kajiyama, Yuichi, 1965, Controversy between the Sākāra- and Nirākāra-vādins of the Yogācāra School – Some Materials, Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 14, 26
- Kammerer, François, 2021, The Illusion of Conscious Experience, Synthese, 198, 845, 10.1007/s11229-018-02071-y · DOI
- Kano, KanoSeongcheol KimJundo Nagashima, 2017, Śrāvakabhūmi and Buddhist Manuscripts, 191
- Kapstein, Matthew T., 2018, Who Wrote the Trisvabhāvanirdeśa? Reflections on an Enigmatic Text and its Place in the History of Buddhist Philosophy, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 46, 1, 10.1007/s10781-017-9334-2 · DOI
- Kellner, Birgit, 2010, Self-Awareness (Svasaṃvedana) in Dignāga’s Pramāṇasamuccaya and -Vṛtti: A Close Reading, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 38, 203, 10.1007/s10781-010-9091-y · DOI
- Kellner, Birgit, 2014, Changing Frames in Buddhist Thought: The Concept of Ākāra in Abhidharma and in Buddhist Epistemological Analysis, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 42, 275, 10.1007/s10781-013-9190-7 · DOI
- Kellner, BirgitJoerg Tuske, 2017, Indian Epistemology and Metaphysics, 102
- Kramer, Jowita, 2013, Sthiramati’s Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā, Part 1: Critical Edition
- Kramer, Jowita, 2016, Some Remarks on Sthiramati and his Putative Authorship of the Madhyāntavibhāgaṭīkā, the *Sūtrālaṃkāravṛttibhāṣya and the Triṃśikāvijñaptibhāṣya, Buddhist Studies Review, 33, 47
- Nagao, Gadjin M., 1964, Madhyāntavibhāgabhāṣya
- Pradhan, Prahlad, 1967, Abhidharmakosabhāṣya of Vasubandhu
- Rosenthal, David, 2011, Exaggerated Reports: Reply to Block, Analysis, 71, 431, 10.1093/analys/anr039 · DOI
- Sakuma, Hidenori, 2020, Was There Really Only One Commentator Named Sthiramati?, Tetsugaku Shisō Ronshū, 45, 39
- Sangpo, Gelong Lodrö, 2012, Abhidharmakośabhāṣỵa: The Treasury of Abhidharma and Its (Auto) Commentary
- Schmithausen, Lambert, 1987, Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra philosophy
- Shastri, Shantibhiksu, 1956, Pañcaskandhakaprakaraṇa of Vasubandhu, The Indian Historical Quarterly, 32, 368
- Silk, Jonathan A., 2018, Materials Toward the Study of Vasubandhu’s Viṁśikā (I): Sanskrit and Tibetan Critical Editions of the Verses and Autocommentary; An English Translation and Annotations
- Stanley, Richard (1988). A Study of the Madhyāntavibhāga-Bhāṣya-Ṭīkā [Doctoral dissertation]. Australian National University. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/12988
- Steinkeller, Ernst, 2007, Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇaviniścaya: Parts 1 and 2
- Tomlinson, Davey K., 2018, The Tantric Context of Ratnākaraśānti’s Philosophy of Mind, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 46, 355, 10.1007/s10781-018-9351-9 · DOI
- Tomlinson, David K. (2019). Buddhahood and Philosophy of Mind: Ratnākaraśānti, Jñānaśrīmitra, and the Debate over Mental Content (Ākāra) [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Chicago]. Knowledge@Chicago. https://knowledge.uchicago.edu/record/1840
- Tzohar, Roy, 2017, Imagine Being a Preta: Early Indian Yogācāra Approaches to Intersubjectivity, Sophia, 56, 337, 10.1007/s11841-016-0544-y · DOI
- Urban, Hugh B.Paul J. Griffiths, 1994, What Else Remains in Śūnyatā? An Investigation of Terms for Mental Imagery in the Madhyāntavibhāga-Corpus, Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 17, 1
- von Rospatt, Alexander, 1995, The Buddhist Doctrine of Momentariness: A Survey of the Origins and Early Phase of this Doctrine up to Vasubandhu
- Waldron, William S., 2003, The Buddhist Unconscious: The Ālaya-Vijñāna in the Context of Indian Buddhist Thought, 10.4324/9780203451175 · DOI · Paper page
- Wogihara, Unrai, 1936, Sphuṭārthā Abhidharmakośavyākhyā by Yaśomitra (Part II)
- Yamaguchi, Susumu, 1934, Madhyāntavibhāgaṭīkā
- Yao, Zhihua, 2005, The Buddhist Theory of Self-Cognition
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaturvedi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Chaturvedi, Amit
- ORCID
- Chaturvedi, Amit
- Venue
- Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- University of Michigan Library
- Published
- 2024-02-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 0
- ISSN
- 2330-4014 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392296791
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2025: 11 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Chonnam National University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- illusionism, phenomenal consciousness, Vasubandhu, Sthiramati, Yogācāra, qualia, vedanā, representationalism, Sanskrit philosophy, Buddhist epistemology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review