The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tribal and Chiefly Warfare in South America
Abstract
This book presents new data on warfare from both ethnohistoric and ethnographic sources. The author documents principal differences between tribal and chiefly warfare; outlines the evidence archaeologists can expect to recover from warfare; and formulates testable hypotheses on the role of warfare in social and political evolution. This monograph is part of a series on Latin American Ethnohistory and Archaeology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Los datos de conflicto, si bien circunstanciales, indican un poder militarista en la zona, reseñado por otros antropólogos a partir de fuentes etnohistóricas.
“Los datos de conflicto, si bien circunstanciales, indican un poder militarista en la zona, reseñado por otros antropólogos a partir de fuentes etnohistóricas (Carneiro 2017;Redmond 1994).”
From Desigualdades sociales, producción y consumo en unidades domésticas prehispánicas en el valle de popayán, colombia (2023) · cites this paper as Redmond 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Betwixt and between in the intermediate area
Drennan, R. D. (1996) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/bf02229183 · Cited by 42
Giraldo Tenorio, H. J., Díaz Astaiza, M. F., & Corrales Otero, G. A. (2023) · Revista Colombiana De Antropología · doi:10.22380/2539472x.2364
Metadata
- Authors
- Redmond, E. M.
- Publisher
- U OF M MUSEUM ANTHRO ARCHAEOLOGY
- Published
- 1994
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
