Cited by 27Migration and Exile StudiesGender and Women's RightsBorder Security and International Relations

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Post-2015 European Border Regime. New Approaches in a Shifting Field

Open access
Hess, Sabine, Kasparek, Bernd·2019·Archivio antropologico mediterraneo

Abstract

Against the background of our recent ethnographic research project on the European border regime in South-East Europe in 2016, the article calls for a re-visiting of established paradigms and approaches in border studies. The article assesses established theoretical conceptualisations of border studies, such as securitisation, externalisation, digitalisation, but also internal mobility regimes and humanitarian rationales. Focussing especially on the vast encampment within Europe, the inner-European buffer zoning, shifting legal foundations as well as new infrastructures of migration control, the authors argue for an extension of theoretical and methodological perspectives of border studies by drawing on insights from legal anthropology and camp and infrastructural studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4000/aam.1812

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 90

  1. Agamben G., 1998 Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  2. Agier M., 2011 Managing the Undesirables, Polity, Cambridge.
  3. Agier M., Bouagga Y., Galisson M., Hanappe C., Pette M., Wannesson P. (hg.), 2020 Der »Dschungel von Calais«. Über das Leben in einem Flüchtlingslager, Transcript, Bielefeld. · DOI
  4. Andersson R., 2017 «Rescued and Caught: The Humanitarian-Security Nexus at Europe's Frontiers», in N. De Genova (ed.), The Borders of “Europe”: Autonomy of Migration, Tactics of Bordering, Duke University Press, Durham: 64-94. · DOI
  5. Andrijasevic R., 2010 «From Exception to Excess: Detention and Deportations across the Mediterranean Space», in N. De Genova, Peutz, N. (eds.), The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space and the Freedom of Movement, Duke University Press, Durham: 147-165. · DOI
  6. Balibar É., 2002 «What Is a Border?», in É. Balibar (ed.), Politics and the Other Scene, Verso, London: 75-86.
  7. 10.1080/14650045.2012.660579 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/03043754020270S105 · DOI
  9. Bigo D., Guild E., 2005 «Policing in the Name of Freedom», in D. Bigo, Guild, E. (eds.), Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement Into and Within Europe, Ashgate, Aldershot: 1-13.
  10. 10.1080/14650045.2014.884561 · DOI
  11. Brambilla C., Laine J., Scott J.W., Bocchi G. (eds.), 2015 Borderscaping: Imaginations and Practices of Border Making, Routledge, London-New York. · DOI
  12. 10.1177/0268580907070126 · DOI
  13. 10.1163/ej.9789004165038.i-568 · DOI
  14. Bužinkić E., Hameršak M. (eds.), 2018 Formation and Disintegration of the Balkan Refugee Corridor: Camps, Routes and Borders in the Croatian , Context, Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research, Zagreb.
  15. 10.1111/j.1755-618X.2004.tb00783.x · DOI
  16. Casas-Cortes M. et al., 2015 «New Keywords: Migration and Borders», in Cultural Studies, 29 (1): 55-87. · DOI
  17. Cuttitta P., 2014 «From the Cap Anamur to Mare Nostrum. Humanitarianism and Migration Controls at the EU's Maritime Borders», in C. Matera, Taylor, A. (eds.), The Common European Asylum System and Human Rights: Enhancing Protection in Times of Emergencies, Asser Institute, Den ,: Haag,: 11-37.
  18. 10.5771/0023-4834-2011-3-244 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01246.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1057/9780230299382 · DOI
  21. Donnan, H., Wilson T.M., 2010, «Ethnography, Security and the “Frontier Effect” in Borderlands», in H. Donnan, Wilson, T.M. (eds.), Borderlands. Ethnographic Approaches to Security, Power and Identity, University Press of America, Lanham: 1-21. · DOI
  22. Dünnwald S., 2015 «Remote Control? Europäisches Migrationsmanagement in Mauretanien und Mali», in Movements. Journal Für Kritische Migrations- und Grenzregimeforschung, 1 (1): 1-32, https://movements-journal.org/issues/01.grenzregime/08.duennwald--remote-control-mali-mauretanien.pdf. · DOI
  23. 10.1215/08992363-2007-007 · DOI
  24. 10.1057/9780230294882 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/08865655.2017.1344562 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/CBO9780511819193 · DOI
  27. Hess S., Karakayali S., 2007 «New Governance oder die imperiale Kunst des Regierens. Asyldiskurs und Menschenrechtsdispositiv im neuen EU-Migrationsmanagement», in TRANSIT MIGRATION Forschungsgruppe (hg.), Turbulente Ränder. Neue Perspektiven auf Migration an den Grenzen Europas, Transcript, Bielefeld: 41-57. · DOI
  28. Hess S., Tsianos V., 2007 «Europeanizing Transnationalism! Provincializing Europe! Konturen eines neuen Grenzregimes» In TRANSIT MIGRATION Forschungsgruppe (hg.), Turbulente Ränder. Neue Perspektiven Auf Migration an den Grenzen Europas, Transcript, Bielefeld: 23-38. · DOI
  29. Hess S., Kasparek B. (eds.), 2010 Grenzregime: Diskurse, Praktiken, Institutionen in Europa, Assoziation , A, Berlin.
  30. Hess S., Kasparek B., 2017 «Under Control? Or Border (as) Conflict: Reflections on the European Border Regime», in Social Inclusion, 5 (3): 58-68. · DOI
  31. Hess S., Kasparek B., Schwertl M., 2018 «Regime ist nicht Regime ist nicht Regime. Zum theoriepolitischen Einsatz der ethnograpfischen (Grenz-)Regimeanalyse», in A. Pott, C. Rass, Wolff, F. (eds.), Was Ist Ein Migrationsregime? What Is a Migration Regime?, Springer, Wiesbaden: 257-284. · DOI
  32. 10.3224/peripherie.v35i138-139.24300 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/1468-5965.00263 · DOI
  34. 10.4324/9780203008690 · DOI
  35. Inhetveen K., 2010 Die Politische Ordnung des Flüchtlingslagers. Akteure–Macht–Organisation. Eine Ethnographie im Südlichen Afrika, Transcript, Bielefeld. · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.002 · DOI
  37. Kasparek B., 2015 «Was War Mare Nostrum? Dokumentation einer Debatte um die italienische Marineoperation», in Movements. Journal Für Kritische Migrations-Und Grenzregimeforschung 1 (1): 1-28, https://movements-journal.org/issues/01.grenzregime/11.kasparek--mare-nostrum-debatte.pdf. · DOI
  38. Kasparek B., 2016a «Complementing Schengen: The Dublin System and the European Border and Migration Regime», in H. Bauder, Matheis, C. (eds.), Migration Policy and Practice. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship, Palgrave Macmillan, New York: 59-78. · DOI
  39. Kasparek B., Tsianos V., 2015 «Back to the Future. Blair-Schily Reloaded», in Movements. Journal Für Kritische Migrations- und Grenzregimeforschung (1 (1): 1-25, http://movements-journal.org/issues/01.grenzregime/03.kasparek,tsianos--back-to-the-future-blair-schily-reloaded.html. · DOI
  40. 10.1093/ijrl/eer017 · DOI
  41. Koslowski R., 2005 «Smart Borders, Virtual Borders or No Borders: Homeland Security Choices for the United States and Canada», in Law and Business Review of the Americas, 11, Summer-Fall : 2005: 527-550.
  42. Krause U., 2013 Linking Refugee Protection with Development Assistance, Nomos, Baden-Baden. · DOI
  43. 10.1186/s40878-017-0069-8 · DOI
  44. Lahav G., Guiraudon V., 2000 «Comparative Perspectives on Border Control: Away from the Border and Outside the State», in P. Andreas, Snyder, T. (eds.), The Wall Around the West. State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham: 55-77.
  45. 10.1080/1350176042000248098 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/01402380500512684 · DOI
  47. 10.1177/0309132519856702 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/0967010615590752 · DOI
  49. Mezzadra S., Neilson B., 2013 Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor, Duke University Press, Durham. · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.005 · DOI
  51. Misa T.J., Schot J., 2005, «Introduction: Inventing Europe: Technology and the Hidden Integration of Europe», in History and Technology, 21 (1): 1-19. · DOI
  52. 10.1111/1467-9655.00052 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/jcms.12651 · DOI
  54. Mouzourakis M., 2014 “We Need to Talk About Dublin”: Responsibility Under the Dublin System as a Blockage to Asylum Burden-Sharing in the European , Union, Refugee Studies Centre, Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford.
  55. Nader L., Yngvesson B., 1973 «On Studying the Ethnography of Law and Its Consequences», in J.J. Honig Mann (ed.), Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Rand McNally, Chicago: 883-921.
  56. 10.1002/9780470696569 · DOI
  57. 10.1111/ips.12076 · DOI
  58. Panagiotidis E., Tsianos V., 2007 «Denaturalizing “Camps”. Überwachen und Entschleunigen in der Schengener Ägäis-Zone», in Transit Migration Forschungsgruppe (hg.), Turbulente Ränder. Neue Perspektiven auf Migration an den Grenzen Europas, Transcript, Bielefeld: 59-87. · DOI
  59. 10.1093/refuge/fei033 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1080/14650040903081297 · DOI
  61. 10.1177/0967010618796670 · DOI
  62. Picozza F., 2017a «Dubliners: Unthinking Displacement, Illegality and Refugeeness Within Europe's Geographies of Asylum», in N. De Genova (ed.), The Borders of “Europe”: Autonomy of Migration, Tactics of Bordering, Duke University Press, Durham. · DOI
  63. Picozza F., 2017b «Dublin on the Move», in Movements. Journal Für Kritische Migrations- und Grenzregimeforschung (3 (1): 71-88, http://movements-journal.org/issues/04.bewegungen/05.picozza--dublin-on-the-move.pdf. · DOI
  64. 10.5749/9780816653874 · DOI
  65. Ravenda A.F., 2009 «Embodying Temporary Stay Centres. An Ethnography of Immigrants and Institutions in the South-Eastern Border of Italy (Apulia)», in G. Pizza, H. Johannessen (eds.), Embodiment and the State: Health, Biopolitics and the Intimate Life of State Powers, monographic issue of AM - Rivista della Società Italiana di Antropologia Medica, n. 27-ottobre 2009, ottobre 2009, Argo, Lecce: 113-135.
  66. 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01381.x · DOI
  67. 10.1177/1368431006063330 · DOI
  68. 10.1080/13562570801969333 · DOI
  69. 10.1080/13621025.2011.534911 · DOI
  70. Salter M., 2011 «Places Everyone! Studying the Performativity of the Border», in Political Geography, 30 (2): 66-67.
  71. Schuster L., 2010 «Engendering Insecurity: The EU Asylum Regime», in G. Lazaridis (ed.), Security, Insecurity and Migration in Europe, Ashgate, Farnham: 101-118.
  72. Schuster L., 2011 «Dublin II and Eurodac: Examining the (Un)Intendend(?) Consequences», in Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 18 (3): 401-416. · DOI
  73. 10.1080/13621025.2014.937643 · DOI
  74. 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1401512 · DOI
  75. 10.1177/00027649921955326 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Star S.L., 2002 «Infrastructure and Ethnographic Practice: Working on the Fringes», in Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 14 (2): 107-122.
  77. 10.1177/0263775818759335 · DOI
  78. 10.1007/s41059-015-0011-y · DOI
  79. 10.1093/jrs/fev024 · DOI
  80. Umek D., Minca C., Šantić D., 2018 «The Refugee Camp as Geopolitics: The Case of Preševo (Serbia)», in M. Paradiso (ed.), Mediterranean Mobilities. Europe's Changing Relationships, Springer, New York - Berlin - Heidelberg: 37-54. · DOI
  81. 10.1111/1467-9663.00189 · DOI
  82. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00522.x · DOI
  83. Vradis A., Papada E., Painter J., Papoutsi A., 2019 New Borders: Hotspots and the European Migration Regime, Pluto Press, London. · DOI
  84. 10.1068/d274t · DOI
  85. 10.1177/1368431006063332 · DOI
  86. Walters W., 2008 «Acts of Demonstration: Mapping the Territory of (Non-)Citizenship», in E. Isen, Nielsen, G.M. (eds.), Acts of Citizenship, Zed Books, London: 182-206.
  87. Walters W., 2011. «Foucault and Frontiers: Notes on the Birth of the Humanitarian Border», in U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, Lemke, T. (eds.), Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges, Routledge, New York-London: 138-164.
  88. 10.4324/9780203299722 · DOI
  89. Wilson R.A., 2000 «Reconciliation and Revenge in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Rethinking Legal Pluralism and Human Rights», in Current Anthropology, 41 (1): 75-98. · DOI
  90. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.tb00009.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hess, S., & Kasparek, B.
Venue
Archivio antropologico mediterraneo
Publisher
OpenEdition
Published
2019
Volume
21
Issue
2
ISSN
2038-3215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998482645
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archivio antropologico mediterraneo (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Gender and Women's Rights
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Border Security and International Relations
Keywords
European border regime, securitization, externalization, digitalization, encampment, buffer zones, legal anthropology, Southeastern Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review