“A New Job after Retirement”: Negotiating Grandparenting and Intergenerational Relationships in Urban China
Open accessAbstract
Based on interviews with 120 adult only children and their parents in urban Tianjin, this article shows how grandparenting becomes a crucial site for the intergenerational negotiation around childcare, family obligations, and the unfulfilled aspirations for individualisation. While only child couples rely heavily on their parents for childcare, a lot of tensions are involved in this process. Although grandparents do not always willingly embrace the heavy burden of intergenerational childcare, their concern about elderly care sometimes compels them to nevertheless take up the work. Through providing a nuanced picture of grandparenting in urban China, this article seeks to reveal the changing ideas of family obligation and responsibility, as well as the social transformation in China that underpins such change. It argues that the individualisation process is far from finished, as reality is pulling people back to solve problems within the family.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contemporary Chinese families continue to rely heavily upon grandparents, especially grandmothers, for childcare when children are young.
“At the same time, contemporary Chinese families continue to rely heavily upon grandparents, especially grandmothers, for childcare when children are young (Ji et al., 2020;Lin & Mao, 2022).”
From Mothers and grandmothers: <scp>Rethinking</scp> motherhood in the context of intergenerational caregiving (2025) · cites this paper as Lin & Mao, 2022
Cites
Intergenerational Ties in Context: Grandparents Caring for Grandchildren in China
Chen, F., Liu, G., & Mair, C. A. (2011) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sor012 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
The Chinese path to individualization
Yan, Y. (2010) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01323.x · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hanser, A., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/jomf.13070 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lin, Q., & Mao, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Lin, Qing
- Mao, Jingyu
- ORCID
- Venue
- China Perspectives
- Publisher
- OpenEdition
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 2022/1
- Pages
- 47-56
- ISSN
- 1996-4617 (ISSN-L)
- 2070-3449
- OpenAlex
- W4221007591
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pub.uni-bielefeld.de
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- China Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- University of Edinburgh
- Universität Bielefeld
- H2020 European Research Council (803614)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Keywords
- grandparenting, intergenerational relations, only children, intergenerational childcare, family responsibilities, individualization, elderly care, retirement, urban China, Tianjin, social change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review