Cited by 2Religious Freedom and DiscriminationCriminal Law and PolicyTheology and Canon Law Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evasion spirituelle autorisée : en détention, prière de réinsérer

Open access
Liwerant, Sara·2006·Droit et Cultures

Abstract

Comment le droit français envisage la prière dans ses prisons républicaines ? Une lecture attentive du Code de procédure pénale révèle que l’exercice religieux en prison est reconnu au titre de la réinsertion et non comme une liberté individuelle. Entendue essentiellement comme un exercice collectif, les prières justifient des aménagements de la détention afin de répondre aux exigences du principe d’égalité et à l’horizon obligé de la réinsertion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4000/droitcultures.824

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liwerant, S.
Affiliations
Université Paris Nanterre (FR)
Corresponding author
Liwerant, Sara
Venue
Droit et Cultures
Publisher
OpenEdition
Published
2006
Volume
51
ISSN
  • 0247-9788 (ISSN-L)
  • 2109-9421
OpenAlex
W346134866
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Droit et Cultures (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Theology and Canon Law Studies
Keywords
religious exercises, incarceration, Code of Criminal Procedure, reintegration, collective religious practice, principle of equality, French criminal procedure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review