CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Online and Blended LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsHealth Education and Validation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validating the Learning Strategies Scale Among Business and Management Students in the Semi-Presential University Context

Cândido, Ricardo Batista, Yamamoto, Iara, Zerbini, Thaís·2020·Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership
DOI 10.4018/978-1-7998-2124-3.ch013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This research validates the University Learning Strategy Scale (EEA) used by Martins and Zerbini (2014), among Business and Management students of semi-presential courses. The sample had 350 observations obtained from students of a Higher Education Institution based in the State of São Paulo. Preliminary results showed that although the Learning Strategies Scale (LES) was developed and validated in a hybrid context application, in this research it was applied to the semi-present context and its results were satisfactory, presenting high internal consistency indices, with alphas of Cronbach's of (α = 0.94) for the general scale. Regarding the four dimensions, the result was also very close to the LES with 1) (α = 0.92) for the Cognitive Strategies construct, 2) (α = 0.77) for Emotion Control, 3) (α = 0.85) for Self-Regulatory Strategies and 4) (α = 0, 83) for Interpersonal Help. This scale shows evidence of instrument validity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/978-1-7998-2124-3.ch013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. L.Bartalo, 2006, Mensuração de estratégias de estudo e aprendizagem de alunos universitários: Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) adaptação e validação para o brasil
  2. 10.5433/1981-8920.2008v13n2p1 · DOI
  3. 10.1023/A:1004181331049 · DOI
  4. 10.1590/S1413-294X2009000200007 · DOI
  5. 10.1590/S0102-37722006000300006 · DOI
  6. da Fonseca, V. (2014). Papel das funções cognitivas, conativas e executivas na aprendizagem: uma abordagem neuropsicopedagógica. Revista Psicopedagogia, 31(96), 236–253. Retrieved from http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84862014000300002&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
  7. 10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.64 · DOI
  8. 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.21 · DOI
  9. R. M.Gagné, 1974, Como se realiza a aprendizagem
  10. 10.1590/S2176-66812012000400006 · DOI
  11. Hair-Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. (Bookman, Ed.) (6th ed.). Porto Alegre, Brazil: Bookman.
  12. 10.1590/1413-82712014019002007 · DOI
  13. R. E.Mayer, 1981, Cognição e aprendizagem humana
  14. MEC/INEP. (2000). Vol. 0, pp. 1980–1998). Brasília: Evolução do Ensino Superior - Graduação.
  15. 10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.004 · DOI
  16. Monereo, C., Castelló, M., Clariana, M., Palma, M., & Pérez, M. Li. (2007). Estrategias de enseñanza y aprendizaje: formación del profesorado y aplicación en la escuela (12th ed.). Barcelona, Spain: Graó.
  17. J.Nisbett, 1987, Learning Strategies
  18. 10.1590/S0080-62342009000500002 · DOI
  19. J. I.Pozo, 1996, Estratégias de Aprendizagem, Desenvolvimento Psicológico e Educação: psicologia da educação, Vol. 2, 176
  20. 10.1016/0883-0355(89)90069-4 · DOI
  21. R. J.Richardson, 2015, Pesquisa Social: Métodos e Técnicas
  22. P.Warr, 1998, Learning strategies and occupational training., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13, 83
  23. 10.1348/000712600161853 · DOI
  24. M. A.Zabalza, 2004, O ensino superior universitário: seus cenários e seus protagonistas
  25. Zerbini, T., Carvalho, R. S., & Abbad, G. (2005). Treinamento a Distância via Internet: construção e validação de Escala de Estratégias de Aprendizagem. In XXIX Encontro da Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (pp. 17–21). Brasília.
  26. 10.1590/S1413-82712008000200005 · DOI

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Cândido, R. B., Yamamoto, I., & Zerbini, T.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Salvador (BR)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
ORCID
Venue
Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership
Publisher
IGI Global
Published
2020
Pages
219-231
ISSN
  • 2326-9022 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-9030
DOI
10.4018/978-1-7998-2124-3.ch013
OpenAlex
W3011272846
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.73
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
scale validation, business and management students, semi-presential education, hybrid learning, cognitive strategies, emotion control, self-regulation strategies, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validating the Learning Strategies Scale Among Business and Management Students in the Semi-Presential University Context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4018/978-1-7998-2124-3.ch013
The paper
Cândido, R. B., Yamamoto, I., & Zerbini, T. (2020). Validating the Learning Strategies Scale Among Business and Management Students in the Semi-Presential University Context. Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2124-3.ch013