The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advanced Mediating Effects Tests, Multi-Group Analyses, and Measurement Model Assessments in PLS-Based SEM
Abstract
Use of the partial least squares (PLS) method has been on the rise among e-collaboration researchers. It has also seen increasing use in a wide variety of fields of research. This includes most business-related disciplines, as well as the social and health sciences. The use of the PLS method has been primarily in the context of PLS-based structural equation modeling (SEM). This article discusses a variety of advanced PLS-based SEM uses of critical coefficients such as standard errors, effect sizes, loadings, cross-loadings and weights. Among these uses are advanced mediating effects tests, comprehensive multi-group analyses, and measurement model assessments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
Texas A&M International University, Kock, N., Lynn, G., & Stevens Institute of Technology (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00302 · Cited by 3,783
Self-citationDiamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x · Cited by 3,410 · cited 1×
“These criteria are generally consistent with formative latent variable theory (see, e.g., Diamantopoulos, 1999; Diamantopoulos & Winklhofer, 2001; Diamantopoulos & Siguaw, 2006).”
BackgroundSpecifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research1
Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148814 · Cited by 32
Cited by
Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12131 · Cited by 2,621
Self-citationDubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 · Cited by 958
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Childe, S. J. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-01-2018-0119 · Cited by 480
Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy
Bag, S., Wood, L. C., Mangla, S. K., & Luthra, S. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104502 · Cited by 339
MEDIATION ANALYSIS: ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Memon, M. A., Cheah, J.-H., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., & Chuah, F. (2018) · Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling · doi:10.47263/jasem.2(1)01 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Kock, N.
- Venue
- International Journal of e-Collaboration
- Publisher
- IGI Global
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1548-3673 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-3681
- OpenAlex
- W2070629130
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 35.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- ng
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
