Cited by 2Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Can You Feel It?: Effectiveness of Anxiety Cues for the Design of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

Open access
Morton, Jessica, De Letter, Jolien, All, Anissa, Daeseleire, Tine, Depreeuw, Barbara, Haesen, Kim, De Marez, Lieven, Bombeke, Klaas·2021·International Journal of Virtual and Augmented Reality

Abstract

Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) has been widely acknowledged as an effective alternative for in vivo exposure therapy (iVET). So far, previous research focused on long- and short-term effectiveness and comparisons to iVET, whereas the impact of design choices is understudied. Hence, the present study focuses on the effectiveness of several types of anxiety cues for the manipulation of anxiety. More specifically, five interoceptive cues (i.e., “fake” bodily sensations for tunnel vision, light flickering, heartbeat audio, blurred vision, and dizziness) and a physical cue (i.e., heat stimulation) are implemented in the VRET design of a within-subjects experiment with people who have claustrophobic and panic tendencies (N = 24). Results show that adding interoceptive cues significantly increased reported levels of anxiety, independent of the type of interoceptive cue. However, introducing a physical cue in VRET can also be effective but has no real added value when combined. Studies focusing on the design of anxiety cues can be valuable in understanding the effectiveness of VRET.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/ijvar.2021070102

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Morton et al. introduced interoceptive and physical cues in the design process to immerse patients in VRET.

    “For instance, Morton et al. introduced interoceptive and physical cues in the design process to immerse patients in the VRET system experience [132].”

    From SAFEvR MentalVeRse.app: Development of a Free Immersive Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Acrophobia and Claustrophobia (2024) · cites this paper as [132]

    The Stimulus Materials and Study Design sections describe adding interoceptive cues and a physical heat cue to the VRET experience. However, METHOD Participants says the study recruited people with subclinical tendencies who were not clinically diagnosed or seeking psychotherapy, rather than patients. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 2

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rahani, V.K., Vard, A., Najafi, M. (2018). Claustrophobia Game: Design and development of a new virtual reality game for treatment of Claustrophobia. Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors. doi: 10.4103/jmss. · DOI
  2. Schmidt, N., Trakowski, J. (2004). Interoceptive assessment and exposure in panic disorder: A descriptive study. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 11, 81-92. doi:10.1016/S1077-7229(04)80010- · DOI

Authors
Morton, J., De Letter, J., All, A., Daeseleire, T., Depreeuw, B., Haesen, K., De Marez, L., & Bombeke, K.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • MICT, IMEC, Ghent University, Belgium
  • The Human Link, Belgium
  • University Psychiatric Centre Duffel, Belgium & The Human Link, Belgium
Venue
International Journal of Virtual and Augmented Reality
Published
2021-07
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 2473-537X (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-5388
OpenAlex
W4213199768
Cited by
2
References
47
Citations by year
2024: 2
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Virtual and Augmented Reality (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, interoceptive cues, claustrophobia, panic, thermal stimulation, tunnel vision, dizziness, blurred vision, in vivo exposure therapy, virtual reality design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review