The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing
Abstract
Many CEOs and managers understand the importance of knowledge sharing among their employees and are eager to introduce the knowledge management paradigm in their organizations. However little is known about the determinants of the individual’s knowledge sharing behavior. The purpose of this study is to develop an understanding of the factors affecting the individual’s knowledge sharing behavior in the organizational context. The research model includes various constructs based on social exchange theory, self-efficacy, and theory of reasoned action. Research results from the field survey of 467 employees of four large, public organizations show that expected associations and contribution are the major determinants of the individual’s attitude toward knowledge sharing. Expected rewards, believed by many as the most important motivating factor for knowledge sharing, are not significantly related to the attitude toward knowledge sharing. As expected, positive attitude toward knowledge sharing is found to lead to positive intention to share knowledge and, finally, to actual knowledge sharing behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249633 · Cited by 2,891
Cited by
A model of knowledge‐sharing motivation
Gagné, M. (2009) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20298 · Cited by 608
Shiau, W.-L., & Luo, M. M. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.030 · Cited by 471
Mittal, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2015) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-07-2014-0464 · Cited by 434
Sigala, M., & Chalkiti, K. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.032 · Cited by 117
Reychav, I., & Te’eni, D. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.009 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y.-G.
- Venue
- Information Resources Management Journal
- Publisher
- IGI Global
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 14-21
- ISSN
- 1040-1628 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7979
- OpenAlex
- W2092580828
- Cited by
- 1,374
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 85.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- ng
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.