Cited by 35Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesTensor decomposition and applications

Coupled matrix factorization with sparse factors to identify potential biomarkers in metabolomics

Acar, Evrim, Gurdeniz, Gozde, Rasmussen, Morten A., Rago, Daniela, Dragsted, Lars O., Bro, Rasmus·2012·International Journal of Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics

Abstract

Metabolomics focuses on the detection of chemical substances in biological fluids such as urine and blood using a number of analytical techniques including Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS). Among the major challenges in analysis of metabolomics data are (i) joint analysis of data from multiple platforms, and (ii) capturing easily interpretable underlying patterns, which could be further utilized for biomarker discovery. In order to address these challenges, the authors formulate joint analysis of data from multiple platforms as a coupled matrix factorization problem with sparsity penalties on the factor matrices. They developed an all-at-once optimization algorithm, called CMF-SPOPT (Coupled Matrix Factorization with SParse OPTimization), which is a gradient-based optimization approach solving for all factor matrices simultaneously. Using numerical experiments on simulated data, the authors demonstrate that CMF-SPOPT can capture the underlying sparse patterns in data. Furthermore, on a real data set of blood samples collected from a group of rats, the authors use the proposed approach to jointly analyze metabolomics data sets and identify potential biomarkers for apple intake. Advantages and limitations of the proposed approach are also discussed using illustrative examples on metabolomics data sets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/jkdb.2012070102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 35

Authors
Acar, E., Gurdeniz, G., Rasmussen, M. A., Rago, D., Dragsted, L. O., & Bro, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Venue
International Journal of Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics
Published
2012-07-01
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
22-43
ISSN
  • 1947-9115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-9123
OpenAlex
W1971752899
Cited by
35
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
ng
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Computational Mathematics › Tensor decomposition and applications
Keywords
biomarker discovery, metabolomics, cross-platform data integration, NMR spectroscopy, LC-MS, gradient-based optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review