Coupled matrix factorization with sparse factors to identify potential biomarkers in metabolomics
Abstract
Metabolomics focuses on the detection of chemical substances in biological fluids such as urine and blood using a number of analytical techniques including Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS). Among the major challenges in analysis of metabolomics data are (i) joint analysis of data from multiple platforms, and (ii) capturing easily interpretable underlying patterns, which could be further utilized for biomarker discovery. In order to address these challenges, the authors formulate joint analysis of data from multiple platforms as a coupled matrix factorization problem with sparsity penalties on the factor matrices. They developed an all-at-once optimization algorithm, called CMF-SPOPT (Coupled Matrix Factorization with SParse OPTimization), which is a gradient-based optimization approach solving for all factor matrices simultaneously. Using numerical experiments on simulated data, the authors demonstrate that CMF-SPOPT can capture the underlying sparse patterns in data. Furthermore, on a real data set of blood samples collected from a group of rats, the authors use the proposed approach to jointly analyze metabolomics data sets and identify potential biomarkers for apple intake. Advantages and limitations of the proposed approach are also discussed using illustrative examples on metabolomics data sets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sparse PCA overcomes the limitation of PCA in identifying the most prominent part of the pattern.
“Sparse PCA overcomes this limitation (128, 129).”
From The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure (2014) · cites this paper as [128]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Acar, E., Gurdeniz, G., Rasmussen, M. A., Rago, D., Dragsted, L. O., & Bro, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Venue
- International Journal of Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- IGI Global Scientific Publishing
- Published
- 2012-07-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 22-43
- ISSN
- 1947-9115 (ISSN-L)
- 1947-9123
- OpenAlex
- W1971752899
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- ng
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Computational Mathematics › Tensor decomposition and applications
- Keywords
- biomarker discovery, metabolomics, cross-platform data integration, NMR spectroscopy, LC-MS, gradient-based optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review