Cited by 0Amphibian and Reptile BiologyVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryVitamin D Research Studies

Exposure to ultraviolet B radiation or oral supplementation with vitamin D and calcium in leopard geckos: beneficial or not?

Open access
Franco, Francisco, Patrício, Rui, Faustino, Ana·2024·Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública

Abstract

Vitamin D regulates many fundamental physiologic functions in vertebrates, mainly calcium homeostasis. Because of the diversity of reptile species and the various environmental adaptations, many studies have been conducted to understand the individual needs and adaptations of each specie regarding vitamin D, its importance and acquisition in the wild. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation or vitamin D and calcium oral supplementation on plasma levels of ionized calcium in Eublepharis macularius (Leopard gecko). Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein in two check-up appointments five weeks apart and the concentration of ionized calcium (iCa++) was analyzed in 15 Leopard geckos from different owners and submitted to different environmental conditions: supplemented animals (n = 5), animals exposed to UV radiation (n = 5) and animals not supplemented or exposed to radiation (control) (n = 5). iCa++ plasma levels did not vary significantly (p>0.05) among groups, or within each group during the study. The Leopard gecko has the ability to maintain iCa++ concentration, without any supplementation, for at least 42 days, and the supplemented animals seem not to have benefited from supplementation during this period of time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4025/revcivet.v11i2.64006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Franco, F., Patrício, R., & Faustino, A.
Affiliations
University of Évora (PT)
Venue
Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública
Published
2024-08-09
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
66-82
ISSN
2358-4610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413370717
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (04033/2020, UIDB/04033, 04033, UIDB/04033/2020, 10.54499)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
Keywords
leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius, UV-B radiation, vitamin D supplementation, calcium supplementation, ionized calcium, calcium homeostasis, reptile nutrition, captive reptiles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review