Cited by 1Natural Fiber Reinforced Compositesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies

Characterization of Polycaprolactone/Eucomis autumnalis Cellulose Composite: Structural, Thermal, and Mechanical Analysis

Open access
Selikane, Dolly Grace Ann, Gumede, Thandi Patricia, Shingange, Katekani, Malevu, Thembinkosi Donald, Ngwenya, Mbongeni, Kumalo, Fisokuhle·2024·Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive investigation into the preparation and characterization of PCL/EA cellulose composites. The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy results confirm the successful composite fabrication, indicating the absence of chemical reactions during melt-compounding. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed distinct morphologies, with PCL forming a continuous phase and EA cellulose exhibiting a fibrous network. Despite successful embedding of EA cellulose fibers in the composite, fractured surfaces indicated poor interfacial interaction, potentially leading to fiber pull out. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed enhanced thermal stability in the composites, while differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) indicated minimal impact on PCL melting behavior. X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) further demonstrated enhanced crystallinity in the composites, highlighting increased order in PCL crystals. Mechanical testing revealed a modest increase in stiffness attributed to the rigid cellulose fibers. However, a decrease in yield strength, tensile strength, and elongation at break suggested reduced ductility and inferior mechanical properties, consistent with poor interfacial adhesion observed in SEM. Overall, this study contributes valuable insights into the structural, thermal, and mechanical characteristics of PCL/EA cellulose composites, offering a foundation for potential applications in various fields.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4028/p-pt5csd

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Selikane, D. G. A., Gumede, T. P., Shingange, K., Malevu, T. D., Ngwenya, M., & Kumalo, F.
Affiliations
  • Central University of Technology (ZA)
  • Mintek (ZA)
  • Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (ZA)
  • University of the Free State (ZA)
Corresponding author
Gumede, Thandi Patricia
Venue
Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering
Published
2024-07-23
Volume
65
Pages
45-58
ISSN
  • 2296-9837 (ISSN-L)
  • 2296-9845
OpenAlex
W4400921924
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of biomimetics, biomaterials and biomedical engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
Keywords
polycaprolactone, Eucomis autumnalis, cellulose fiber composites, natural fiber reinforcement, melt blending, interfacial adhesion, fiber pull-out, thermal stability, crystallinity, mechanical properties, tensile strength, ductility, composite morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review