Cited by 6Aerospace Engineering and ApplicationsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Novel Particle Swarm Neural Network Model to Optimize Aircraft Fuel Consumption

Open access
Zhang, Ying Jie, Xu, Jian Xing·2013·Advanced Materials Research

Abstract

Due to the complex relations among the various factors, the nonlinear calculation of aircraft fuel consumption is very difficult. The purpose of this paper is to present a simplified method to estimate aircraft fuel consumption using a novel particle swarm neural network. Fuel consumption information obtained directly from QAR recorded flight data is trained by the neural network. The method can avoid the high cost of flight testing and wind tunnel testing. An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm embeds neural network topology to replace the network BP learning algorithm. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method integrates a new particle swarm neural network system, and significantly improves the system's learning ability and prediction of evolutionary effects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.694-697.3370

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. BelaP. Collins: Estimation of aircraft fuel consumption. Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 11 (1982), p.969~975.
  2. Liu Meng, Yuan Lingshuang, Wang Jun: Analysis for environmental control system on civil aircraft. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Vol. 35 (2009), p.972~975.
  3. Markham I.S., Ragsdale C. T: Combining neural networks and statistical predictions to solve the classification problem in discriminant analysis[J].Decision Sciences Vol. 26 (1995), pp.229-242. · DOI
  4. Ratnawecra A, Halgamuge S: Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients [J]. Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 8 (2004), p.240~255. · DOI
  5. Givoni, Moshe and Rietveld, Piet: The environmental implications of airlines' choice of aircraft size. Journal of Air Transport Management. Vol. 16 (2010), p.159~167. · DOI
  6. Button, Kenneth and Taylor, Samantha: International air transportation and economic development. Journal of Air Transport Managment. Vol. 6 (2000), p.209~222. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Balakrishna, Poornima, Ganesan, Rajesh and Sherry, Lance: Accuracy of reinforcement learning algorithms for predicting aircraft. Transportation Research Part C. Vol. 18 (2010), p.950~962. · DOI
  8. Tsaia, Wen-Hsien and Kuob, Lopin: Operating costs and capacity in the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management. Vol. 10 (2004), p.269~275. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y. J., & Xu, J. X.
Affiliations
Civil Aviation University of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Ying Jie
Venue
Advanced Materials Research
Published
2013-05
Volume
694-697
Pages
3370-3374
ISSN
  • 1022-6680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-8985
OpenAlex
W2084062575
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Advanced materials research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Keywords
aircraft fuel consumption, particle swarm optimization, fuel consumption estimation, flight data, neural network topology, nonlinear models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review