Powder Injection Moulding of Alumina Using PEG/PVB Binder Systems
Open accessAbstract
Powder injection moulding (PIM) is a process that is suitable for a fabrication of small and complex shape components. It consists of 4 main steps: feedstock preparation by mixing powder and binder, injection moulding of the prepared feedstock into the desired mould, removal of the binder and finally sintering to obtain materials with specific properties. In this study, powder injection moulding of alumina (Al2O3), using polyethylene glycol (PEG) based binder systems, was investigated. PEG is soluble in water; therefore, the use of organic solvents required for debinding of wax-based binder system can be avoided. PEG with a molecular weight of either 1500 or 4000 was used as a major constituent together with polyvinyl butyral (PVB) as a minor component. Stearic acid was also added during feedstock preparation to act as a lubricant. After mixing the powder with the binder, a variety of Al2O3 feedstocks were injected into the moulds. The mouldings were prepared by a laboratory-scaled plunger-typed machine. Debinding was carried out using a combination of solvent extraction and thermal debinding. Water leaching tests were performed at 30 and 50 °C to study PEGs removal rate. The pyrolysis of PVB was completed during ramping up of the mouldings to the sintering temperature. The mouldings were subjected to sintering at 1500 °C in air. It was found from the study that PEG/PVB binder systems can be used for the preparation of alumina powder injection moulding feedstocks. Specimens retained their shapes during and after leaching of the PEGs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Chuankrerkkul, N., Sooksaen, P., Pakunthod, P., Kosalwit, T., & Pinthong, W.
- Affiliations
- Chulalongkorn University (TH)
- Silpakorn University (TH)
- Venue
- Key Engineering Materials
- Publisher
- Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 545
- Pages
- 173-176
- ISSN
- 1013-9826 (ISSN-L)
- 1662-9795
- OpenAlex
- W2069836046
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Key engineering materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Chulalongkorn University
- Thailand Research Fund
- Silpakorn University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Injection Molding Process and Properties
- Keywords
- powder injection molding, alumina, polyethylene glycol binder, polyvinyl butyral, water leaching, thermal debinding, solvent extraction, feedstock preparation, sintering, pyrolysis, molecular weight effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review