The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moral distress of critical care nurses
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Constraint of nurses by healthcare organizations, from actions the nurses believe are appropriate, may lead to moral distress. OBJECTIVE: To present findings on moral distress of critical care nurses, using an investigator-developed instrument. METHODS: An instrument development design using consensus by three expert judges, test-retest reliability, and factor analysis was used. Study participants (N = 111) were members of a chapter of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, critical care nurses employed in a large medical center, and critical care nurses from a private hospital. A 32-item instrument included items on prolonging life, performing unnecessary tests and treatments, lying to patients, and incompetent or inadequate treatment by physicians. RESULTS: Three factors were identified using factor analysis after expert consensus on the items: aggressive care, honesty, and action response. Nurses in the private hospital reported significantly greater moral distress on the aggressive care factor than did nurses in the medical center. Nurses not working in intensive care experienced higher levels of moral distress on the aggressive care factor than did nurses working in intensive care. Of the 111 nurses, 12% had left a nursing position primarily because of moral distress. CONCLUSIONS: Although the mean scores showed somewhat low levels of moral distress, the range of responses revealed that some nurses experienced high levels of moral distress with the issues. Research is needed on conditions organizations must provide to support the moral integrity of critical care nurses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nurse Moral Distress: a proposed theory and research agenda
Corley, M. C. (2002) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1191/0969733002ne557oa · Cited by 735
Self-citationLiving with conflicts-ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system
Kälvemark, S., Höglund, A. T., Hansson, M. G., Westerholm, P., & Arnetz, B. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00279-x · Cited by 624
Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Moral Distress in Healthcare Professionals
Hamric, A. B., Borchers, C. T., & Epstein, E. G. (2012) · AJOB Primary Research · doi:10.1080/21507716.2011.652337 · Cited by 623
Nurse Moral Distress and Ethical Work Environment
Corley, M. C., Minick, P., Elswick, R. K., & Jacobs, M. (2005) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1191/0969733005ne809oa · Cited by 593
Self-citationWhat is ‘moral distress’? A narrative synthesis of the literature
Morley, G., Ives, J., Bradbury-Jones, C., & Irvine, F. (2019) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733017724354 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Corley, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Critical Care
- Publisher
- AACN Publishing
- Published
- 1995-07-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 280-285
- ISSN
- 1062-3264 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-710X
- OpenAlex
- W1954107441
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moral distress of critical care nurses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4037/ajcc1995.4.4.280
- The paper
- Corley, M. (1995). Moral distress of critical care nurses. American Journal of Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc1995.4.4.280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.