The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Futile Care and Its Effect on Burnout
Abstract
• Background Nurses’ perceptions of futile care may lead to emotional exhaustion. • Objectives To determine the relationship between critical care nurses’ perceptions of futile care and its effect on burnout. • Methods A descriptive survey design was used with 60 critical care nurses who worked full-time and had a minimum of 1 year of critical care experience at the 2 participating hospitals (350–470 beds). Subjects completed a survey on demographics, the Moral Distress Scale, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Six research questions were tested. The results of the following question are presented: Is there a relationship between frequency of moral distress situations involving futile care and emotional exhaustion? • Results A Pearson product moment correlational analysis indicated a significant positive correlation between the score on the emotional exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the score on the frequency subscale of the Moral Distress Scale. Moral distress accounted for 10% of the variance in emotional exhaustion. Demographic variables of age, education, religion, and rotation between the critical care units were significantly related to the major variables. • Conclusions In critical care nurses, the frequency of moral distress situations that are perceived as futile or nonbeneficial to their patients has a significant relationship to the experience of emotional exhaustion, a main component of burnout.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of experienced burnout
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030020205 · Cited by 14,496
Cited by
Burnout syndrome in critical care nursing staff
Poncet, M. C., Toullic, P., Papazian, L., Kentish-Barnes, N., Timsit, J.-F., Pochard, F., Chevret, S., Schlemmer, B., & Azoulay, É. (2007) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200606-806oc · Cited by 750
Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Moral Distress in Healthcare Professionals
Hamric, A. B., Borchers, C. T., & Epstein, E. G. (2012) · AJOB Primary Research · doi:10.1080/21507716.2011.652337 · Cited by 623
Moral Distress Among Healthcare Professionals: Report of an Institution‐Wide Survey
Whitehead, P. B., Herbertson, R. K., Hamric, A. B., Epstein, E. G., & Fisher, J. M. (2015) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.12115 · Cited by 512
Relationship between ICU nurses’ moral distress with burnout and anticipated turnover
Shoorideh, F. A., Ashktorab, T., Yaghmaei, F., & Alavi Majd, H. (2015) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733014534874 · Cited by 212
Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings in a US National Survey of Physicians
Ganguli, I., Simpkin, A. L., Lupo, C., Weissman, A., Mainor, A. J., Orav, E. J., Rosenthal, M. B., Colla, C. H., & Sequist, T. D. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13325 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Meltzer, L. S., & Huckabay, L. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Critical Care
- Publisher
- AACN Publishing
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 202-208
- ISSN
- 1062-3264 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-710X
- OpenAlex
- W2155459979
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Futile Care and Its Effect on Burnout. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4037/ajcc2004.13.3.202
- The paper
- Meltzer, L. S., & Huckabay, L. M. (2004). Critical Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Futile Care and Its Effect on Burnout. American Journal of Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2004.13.3.202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.