Patients’ Recollections of Therapeutic Paralysis in the Intensive Care Unit
Abstract
Background Neuromuscular blocking agents used for therapeutic purposes, such as facilitating mechanical ventilation and relieving life-threatening agitation, paralyze patients but leave them fully conscious. Aggressive sedation or analgesia is necessary to reduce awareness, relieve fear, produce comfort, decrease anxiety, induce unconsciousness, and minimize possible complications such as posttraumatic stress syndrome. Little information is available on the extent to which patients experience awareness during therapeutic paralysis. Objectives To determine and describe the remembered experiences of critical care patients who were given neuromuscular blocking agents and sedatives and/or analgesics to facilitate mechanical ventilation, improve hemodynamic stability, and improve oxygenation. Methods A phenomenological approach with in-depth interviews with 11 patients was used. Data were analyzed by using the constant comparative approach. Results A total of 4 themes and 3 subthemes were identified. The first theme was back and forth between reality and the unreal, between life and death; the subtheme was having weird dreams. The second theme was loss of control; the 2 subthemes were (1) fighting or being tied down and (2) being scared. The third theme was almost dying, and the fourth theme was feeling cared for. Conclusions Patients can remember having both negative and positive experiences during neuromuscular blockade. Steps to improve the experiences of patients receiving neu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
We identified direct evidence from three RCTs that compared procalcitonin-guided protocols for antibiotic initiation vs usual care.
“We identified direct evidence from three RCTs that compared procalcitonin-guided protocols for antibiotic initiation vs usual care (129-131).”
From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [129]
A meta-analysis of the three trials (n = 1,769 ICU patients) found no difference in short-term mortality (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.15), length of ICU stays (MD, 0.19 days; 95% CI, -0.98 to 1.36) or length of hospitalization (MD, 7.00 days; 95% CI, -26.24 to 12.24).
“A meta-analysis of the three trials (n = 1,769 ICU patients) found no difference in short-term mortality (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.15), length of ICU stays (MD, 0.19 days; 95% CI, -0.98 to 1.36) or length of hospitalization (MD, 7.00 days; 95% CI, -26.24 to 12.24).”
From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [129]
Cites
Murray, M. J., Cowen, J., DeBlock, H., Erstad, B., Gray, A. W., Tescher, A. N., McGee, W. T., Prielipp, R. C., Susla, G., Jacobi, J., et al. (2002) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-200201000-00021 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016.
Rhodes, A., Evans, L. E., Alhazzani, W., Levy, M. M., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., Kumar, A., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Nunnally, M. E., et al. (2017) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 · Cited by 6,621 · see citing works
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016.
Rhodes, A., Evans, L. E., Alhazzani, W., Levy, M. M., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., Kumar, A., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Nunnally, M. E., et al. (2017) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000002255 · Cited by 3,652 · see citing works
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., et al. (2021) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005337 · Cited by 2,935 · see citing works
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., et al. (2021) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y · Cited by 5,082 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ballard, N., Robley, L., Barrett, D., Fraser, D., & Mendoza, I.
- Affiliations
- WellStar Health System (US)
- ORCID
- Ballard, Nancy
- Venue
- American Journal of Critical Care
- Publisher
- AACN Publishing
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-94
- ISSN
- 1062-3264 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-710X
- OpenAlex
- W2117029993
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
- Keywords
- neuromuscular blocking agents, patient awareness, patient experience, intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, sedation, analgesia, loss of control, fear, critical illness
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Analgesia, Anxiety, Awareness, Critical Care, Dreams, Female, Humans, Immobilization, Inpatients, Intensive Care Units, Interviews as Topic, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Pain, Procedural Sedation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review