Cited by 32Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsHospital Admissions and OutcomesIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Clinical Effectiveness of a Critical Care Nursing Outreach Service in Facilitating Discharge From the Intensive Care Unit

Williams, T. A., Leslie, G., Finn, J., Brearley, L., Asthifa, M., Hay, B., Laurie, K., Leen, T. +3 more·2010·American Journal of Critical Care

Abstract

Background Improved discharge planning and extension of care to the general care unit for patients transferring from intensive care may prevent readmission to the intensive care unit and prolonged hospital stays. Morbidity, mortality, and costs increase in readmitted intensive care patients. Objectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a critical care nursing outreach service in facilitating discharge from the intensive care unit and providing follow-up in general care areas. Methods A before-and-after study design (with historical controls and a 6-month prospective intervention) was used to ascertain differences in clinical outcomes, length of stay, and cost/benefit. Patients admitted to intensive care units in 3 adult teaching hospitals were recruited. The service centered on follow-up visits by specialist intensive care nurses who reviewed and assessed patients who were to be or had been discharged to general care areas from the intensive care unit. Those nurses also provided education and clinical support to staff in general care areas. Results In total, 1435 patients were discharged during the 6-month prospective period. Length of stay from the time of admission to the intensive care unit to hospital discharge (P = .85), readmissions during the same hospital admission (5.6% vs 5.4%, P = .83), and hospital survival (P = .80) did not differ from before to after the intervention. Conclusions Although other studies have shown beneficial outcomes in Australia and the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4037/ajcc2010965

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, T. A., Leslie, G., Finn, J., Brearley, L., Asthifa, M., Hay, B., Laurie, K., Leen, T., O'Brien, K., Stuart, M., & Watt, M.
Affiliations
Royal Perth Hospital (AU)
Venue
American Journal of Critical Care
Published
2010-08-31
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
e63-e72
ISSN
  • 1062-3264 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-710X
OpenAlex
W2169944402
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
intensive care unit discharge, discharge planning, ICU readmission, length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, employee training, cost-benefit analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Care, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Patient Transfer, Prospective Studies, Western Australia, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review