The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PHYSIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF LODGEPOLE PINE WOUND RESPONSES TO A FUNGAL SYMBIONT OF THE MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE, DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)
Abstract
The acetone-soluble fraction of phloem tissue samples from 78 lodgepole pines was examined prior to and following artificial inoculation with Europhium clavigerum, a fungus transmitted by the mountain pine beetle. All trees showed quantitative increases in the concentration of extractives within 3 days after treatment. Further increases continued for at least 7 days. By this time qualitative changes in the chemical composition of the host tissue had also occurred. Trees were defined as resistant or susceptible depending on whether they survived beetle attack under natural conditions. The composition of the acetone-soluble extracts was similar for the constitutive tissue of resistant and susceptible trees, but the total quantity of acetone extractives of reaction tissue was higher in resistant trees. The ability of trees to respond to fungal inoculation is diminished by mass attack. Trees responded more extensively to inoculation prior to, than during, aggregation under field conditions. An experiment was conducted to simulate this relationship under controlled conditions by examining the effect of multiple fungal inoculations on the production of monoterpenes during the wound response. Individual trees showed a weaker quantitative response on stem sections administered high inoculation densities than on stem sections administered only a single inoculation. Those trees which responded most extensively to a single invasion by the pathogen were more responsive at all inoculum densities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Limonene has been shown to be toxic to several bark beetles e.g. the Southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis (Coyne and Lott 1976), the Western pine beetle D. brevicomis (Smith 1975) and the mountain pine beetle D. ponderosae (Raffa and Berryman 1983).”
From Insecticidal, repellent, antimicrobial activity and phytotoxicity of essential oils: With special reference to limonene and its suitability for control of insect pests (2001) · cites this paper as Raffa and Berryman 1983
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.4039/Ent11497-2 · DOI
- 10.4039/Ent1111255-11 · DOI
- Raffa, 1980, Proc. 2nd IUFRO Confer. on Disperal of forest insects, 213
- 10.1093/ee/11.2.486 · DOI
- Shrimpton, 1978, Theory and practice of mountain pine beetle management in lodgepole pine forests, 64
- 10.1139/b68-104 · DOI
- Tjia, 1975, Phenolic constituents of Norway Spruce resistant aad susceptible to the eastern spruce gall aphid, For. Sci., 22, 180
- 10.2307/1296206 · DOI
- Safranyik, 1975, Management of lodgepole pine ecosystems, 825
- 10.1007/BF00345998 · DOI
- Amman, 1975, U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note, 6
- Hamming, 1972, Interpretation of mass spectra of organic compounds, 694
- McLafferty, 1980, Interpretations of Mass Spectra, 303
- 10.1139/b73-064 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)90015-3 · DOI
- 10.4039/Ent109443-3 · DOI
- 10.1139/b67-116 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.py.07.090169.001211 · DOI
- 10.4039/Ent114797-9 · DOI
- 10.1093/ee/5.6.1225 · DOI
- 10.1094/Phyto-61-174 · DOI
- Shain, 1967, Resistance of sapwood in stems of loblolly pine to infection by Fomes annosus, Phytopathology, 57, 1034
- 10.1016/0022-1910(74)90232-7 · DOI
- Taniguchi, 1979, Inhibitory effect of Isodon diterpenoids on growth and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in lepidopterous insects, Agric. Biol. Chem., 43, 71
- 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)91895-3 · DOI
- 10.2307/1942586 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84361-7 · DOI
- Thalenhorst, 1958, Shriftenreihe der Forstlichen Fakültat der Universitat Gottingen, 126
- 10.4039/Ent1041967-12 · DOI
- 10.1139/b74-324 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.42.1.20 · DOI
- Wood, 1972, R.E.S. Symposium No. 6: Insect/Plant Relationships, 101
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Higher plant terpenoids: A phytocentric overview of their ecological roles
Langenheim, J. H. (1994) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02059809 · Cited by 878
IBRAHIM, M. A., KAINULAINEN, P., & AFLATUNI, A. (2001) · Agricultural and Food Science · doi:10.23986/afsci.5697 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Raffa, K. F., & Berryman, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- ORCID
- Raffa, K. F.
- Venue
- The Canadian Entomologist
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1983-07
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 723-734
- ISSN
- 0008-347X (ISSN-L)
- 1918-3240
- OpenAlex
- W2122448483
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Canadian Entomologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Keywords
- lodgepole pine, mountain pine beetle, fungal symbionts, wounding response, host resistance, monoterpenes, inoculum size, mass attack, host-pathogen interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review