The Functional Response of Invertebrate Predators to Prey Density
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A subsequent fit of a mechanistic Type I functional response model to the relationship between lobsters removed (Ne) and prefish lobster densities (N0) estimated that attack rates were 0.016 lobsters m^-2 h^-1.
“A subsequent fit of a mechanistic Type I functional response model (Holling 1966) to the relationship between lobsters removed ( N e) and prefish lobster densities ( N 0) (Fig. 5B) estimated that attack rates were 0.016 lobsters m -2 h -1 .”
From Intense removal and non-saturating functional responses by recreational divers on spiny lobster Panulirus argus (2003) · cites this paper as Holling 1966
Cites
Bellman, R. E. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400835386 · Cited by 14,588 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics
Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173179 · Cited by 5,502 · see citing works
Trait‐based models of nutrient uptake in microbes extend the Michaelis‐Menten framework
Fiksen, Ø., Follows, M. J., & Aksnes, D. L. (2013) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2013.58.1.0193 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Eggleston, D., Johnson, E., Kellison, G., & Nadeau, D. (2003) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps257197 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Holling, C. S.
- Corresponding author
- Holling, C. S.
- Venue
- Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1966
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- S48
- Pages
- 5-86
- ISSN
- 0071-075X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016804185
- Cited by
- 1,349
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 14.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Entomological Studies and Ecology
- Keywords
- functional response, invertebrate predators, prey density, predator-prey interactions, predation rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
