Cited by 58Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareSurgical Simulation and TrainingInnovations in Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects and Adequacy of High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Training for Obstetrical Nursing

Lee, Woo Sook, Kim, Miok·2011·Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical training for nursing students is limited to rudimentary skills to avoid potential risks. Simulation-Based Training (SBT) can overcome the shortcomings of clinical training. We evaluated the educational effect of SBT for obstetrical nursing students using high-fidelity simulation courses. METHODS: We developed a simulation program for obstetrical nursing students to practice nursing skills that are necessary to provide quality care. The program consisted of four sessions. 1st: An orientation and a preliminary test. 2nd: Learning core skills required in obstetrical nursing. 3rd: Testing each student with scenario. 4th: Providing a debriefing session. At the beginning of the program, students were surveyed about their self-confidence in obstetrical nursing care, and at the end of the program, they were surveyed about the adequacy of SBT as well as self-confidence. RESULTS: Students' self-confidence showed a significant difference before and after simulation. Mean adequacy of SBT was 7.15±1.35 (out of 10). Most students became more interested in Women's Health Nursing after SBT. CONCLUSION: The results from evaluating the effects of simulation-based obstetrical nursing training show that SBT provides invaluable clinical experience for obstetrical nursing students by overcoming the lack of actual clinical involvement in clinical training programs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.433

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. McIntosh, 1997, Nursing Times, 93, 46
  2. Park, 2003, Korean Journal of Medical Education, 15, 143
  3. Park, 2008, Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 51, 950
  4. Park, 1998, Theory and practice of the teaching-learning method (II)

Cited by

See all 58

Metadata

Authors
Lee, W. S., & Kim, M.
Affiliations
  • Korean Red Cross (KR)
  • Namseoul University (KR)
Venue
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
Published
2011
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
433
ISSN
2005-3673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159919096
Cited by
58
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
ko
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
simulation-based training, high-fidelity simulation, nursing students, self-confidence, debriefing, scenario-based learning, women's health nursing, nursing education
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Female, Humans, Male, Obstetric Nursing, Pregnancy, Students, Nursing, Program Evaluation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects and Adequacy of High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Training for Obstetrical Nursing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.433
The paper
Lee, W. S., & Kim, M. (2011). Effects and Adequacy of High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Training for Obstetrical Nursing. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.433