Differences in Wound Healing in Mice with Deficiency of IL-6 versus IL-6 Receptor
Abstract
IL-6 modulates immune responses and is essential for timely wound healing. As the functions mediated by IL-6 require binding to its specific receptor, IL-6Rα, it was expected that mice lacking IL-6Rα would have the same phenotype as IL-6–deficient mice. However, although IL-6Rα–deficient mice share many of the inflammatory deficits seen in IL-6–deficient mice, they do not display the delay in wound healing. Surprisingly, mice with a combined deficit of IL-6 and IL-6Rα, or IL-6–deficient mice treated with an IL-6Rα–blocking Ab, showed improved wound healing relative to mice with IL-6 deficiency, indicating that the absence of the receptor contributed to the restoration of timely wound healing, rather than promiscuity of IL-6 with an alternate receptor. Wounds in mice lacking IL-6 showed delays in macrophage infiltration, fibrin clearance, and wound contraction that were not seen in mice lacking IL-6Rα alone and were greatly reduced in mice with a combined deficit of IL-6 and IL-6Rα. MAPK activation-loop phosphorylation was elevated in wounds of IL-6Rα–deficient mice, and treatment of wounds in these mice with the MEK inhibitor U0126 resulted in a delay in wound healing suggesting that aberrant ERK activation may contribute to improved healing. These findings underscore a deeper complexity for IL-6Rα function in inflammation than has been recognized previously.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The essential involvement of IL-6 in the skin wound healing process is evidenced by delayed wound healing in IL-6−/− mice.
“The essential involvement of IL-6 in the skin wound healing process is evidenced by delayed wound healing in IL-6−/− mice.67,68”
From The Innate Immune System in Acute and Chronic Wounds (2016) · cites this paper as [68]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 249
- Authors
- McFarland-Mancini, M. M., Funk, H. M., Paluch, A. M., Zhou, M., Giridhar, P. V., Mercer, C. A., Kozma, S. C., & Drew, A. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- PDS Biotechnology (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Mingfu
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7219-7228
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2138584334
- Semantic Scholar
- 62fa2788ee2e11b03e5b1b063c7739a83e279eb7
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Cincinnati
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Keywords
- wound healing, interleukin-6, IL-6 receptor alpha, macrophage infiltration, fibrin clearance, wound contraction, MAPK signaling, ERK activation, MEK inhibition, U0126, inflammation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Genotype, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Skin, Wound Healing, Blotting, Southern, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Interleukin-6, Mice, Knockout, Receptors, Interleukin-6, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review