Cited by 293Cell Adhesion Molecules ResearchBarrier Structure and Function StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Differential Roles for Endothelial ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and VCAM-1 in Shear-Resistant T Cell Arrest, Polarization, and Directed Crawling on Blood–Brain Barrier Endothelium

Open access
Steiner, Oliver, Coisne, Caroline, Cecchelli, Roméo, Boscacci, Rémy, Deutsch, Urban, Engelhardt, Britta, Lyck, Ruth·2010·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Endothelial ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 were shown to be essential for T cell diapedesis across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in vitro under static conditions. Crawling of T cells prior to diapedesis was only recently revealed to occur preferentially against the direction of blood flow on the endothelial surface of inflamed brain microvessels in vivo. Using live cell-imaging techniques, we prove that Th1 memory/effector T cells predominantly crawl against the direction of flow on the surface of BBB endothelium in vitro. Analysis of T cell interaction with wild-type, ICAM-1–deficient, ICAM-2–deficient, or ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 double-deficient primary mouse brain microvascular endothelial cells under physiological flow conditions allowed us to dissect the individual contributions of endothelial ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and VCAM-1 to shear-resistant T cell arrest, polarization, and crawling. Although T cell arrest was mediated by endothelial ICAM-1 and VCAM-1, T cell polarization and crawling were mediated by endothelial ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 but not by endothelial VCAM-1. Therefore, our data delineate a sequential involvement of endothelial ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 in mediating shear-resistant T cell arrest, followed by endothelial ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 in mediating T cell crawling to sites permissive for diapedesis across BBB endothelium.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.0903732

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crawling is predominantly mediated by upregulated endothelial ICAM-1 and ICAM-2.

    “Crawling is predominantly mediated by upregulated endothelial ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 (557).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [557]

    The Abstract and Discussion state that endothelial ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 mediate T-cell crawling on blood–brain barrier endothelium. However, the section on pMBMEC barrier characteristics reports that TNF-α upregulated ICAM-1 while ICAM-2 surface levels remained unchanged, so the claim that both are upregulated is not supported. The supplied passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LFA-1-dependent T cell crawling against blood flow occurs until a location permissive to diapedesis is found.

    “This then allows LFA-1–dependent T cell crawling against blood flow until a location permissive to diapedesis is found (116).”
  • T cell diapedesis across CNS blood vessels involves firm attachment to endothelial cells (dependent on ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and VCAM-1) to resist shear forces.

    “The process of T cell diapedesis across CNS blood vessels involves firm attachment to endothelial cells (dependent on ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and VCAM-1) to resist the shear forces of vascular flow.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 293

Authors
Steiner, O., Coisne, C., Cecchelli, R., Boscacci, R., Deutsch, U., Engelhardt, B., & Lyck, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Université Lille Nord de France (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2010-10
Volume
185
Issue
8
Pages
4846-4855
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1948291240
Cited by
293
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Novartis Foundation
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society
  • European Commission (202213, 201024)
  • Schweizerische Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
ICAM-1, ICAM-2, VCAM-1, T cell polarization, blood-brain barrier, brain microvascular endothelium, shear flow, leukocyte-endothelium interaction, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Cell Adhesion, Cell Communication, Chemotaxis, Leukocyte, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, T-Lymphocytes, Antigens, CD, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Mice, Knockout, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1, Endothelial Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review