IFN-γ Promotes Muscle Damage in the mdx Mouse Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy by Suppressing M2 Macrophage Activation and Inhibiting Muscle Cell Proliferation
Open accessAbstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a degenerative disorder that leads to death by the third decade of life. Previous investigations have shown that macrophages that invade dystrophic muscle are a heterogeneous population consisting of M1 and M2 macrophages that promote injury and repair, respectively. In the present investigation, we tested whether IFN-γ worsens the severity of mdx dystrophy by activating macrophages to a cytolytic M1 phenotype and by suppressing the activation of proregenerative macrophages to an M2 phenotype. IFN-γ is a strong inducer of the M1 phenotype and is elevated in mdx dystrophy. Contrary to our expectations, null mutation of IFN-γ caused no reduction of cytotoxicity of macrophages isolated from mdx muscle and did not reduce muscle fiber damage in vivo or improve gross motor function of mdx mice at the early, acute peak of pathology. In contrast, ablation of IFN-γ reduced muscle damage in vivo during the regenerative stage of the disease and increased activation of the M2 phenotype and improved motor function of mdx mice at that later stage of the disease. IFN-γ also inhibited muscle cell proliferation and differentiation in vitro, and IFN-γ mutation increased MyoD expression in mdx muscle in vivo, showing that IFN-γ can have direct effects on muscle cells that could impair repair. Taken together, the findings show that suppression of IFN-γ signaling in muscular dystrophy reduces muscle damage and improves motor performance by promoting the M2 macrophage phenotype and by direct actions on muscle cells.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In models of muscular dystrophy, macrophage polarization may play an important role in muscle wasting; progenitor cells are recruited to sites of mixed M1/M2 inflammation, and the lack of an M1 to M2 switch leads to ineffective remodeling and depletion of progenitor reserves.
“Studies have also suggested that macrophage polarization may play an important role in the process of muscle wasting which occurs in models of muscular dystrophy [124,126,127].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [127]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 158
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [1]Tidball JG Villalta SA 2010 Interactions between muscle and the immune system regulate muscle growth and regeneration Amer J Physiol 298 R1173 1187 PMC2867520 20219869
- [11]Cullen MJ Jaros E 1988 Ultrastructure of the skeletal muscle in the X chromosome-linked dystrophic (mdx) mouse. Comparison with Duchenne muscular dystrophy Acta Neuropathol 77 69 81 3239377
- Authors
- Villalta, S. A., Deng, B., Rinaldi, C., Wehling-Henricks, M., & Tidball, J. G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California , Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
- Corresponding author
- Deng, Bo
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5419-5428
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- PMC
- PMC3208069
- OpenAlex
- W2102009945
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Muscular Dystrophy Association (157881)
- National Institutes of Health (R01 AR/AG054451)
- National Institute on Aging (R01 AR/AG054451)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR047855, R01 AR47721, R01AR047721, F31AR054724, R01 AR47855)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
- Keywords
- Duchenne muscular dystrophy, mdx mice, interferon-gamma, M2 macrophages, M1 macrophages, macrophage polarization, muscle damage, muscle regeneration, muscle cell proliferation, MyoD, motor function, dystrophic muscle
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cells, Cultured, Disease Models, Animal, Growth Inhibitors, Immunosuppressive Agents, Interferon-gamma, Macrophage Activation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Regeneration, Immunophenotyping, Mice, Inbred mdx, Mice, Knockout, Muscle, Skeletal, Coculture Techniques, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne, Mice, Mice, 129 Strain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review