Cited by 641T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyInfluenza Virus Research StudiesImmune responses and vaccinations

Cutting Edge: Tissue-Retentive Lung Memory CD4 T Cells Mediate Optimal Protection to Respiratory Virus Infection

Open access
Teijaro, John R, Turner, Damian, Pham, Quynh, Wherry, E John, Lefrançois, Leo, Farber, Donna L·2011·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

We identify in this article a new class of lung tissue-resident memory CD4 T cells that exhibit tissue tropism and retention independent of Ag or inflammation. Tissue-resident memory CD4 T cells in the lung did not circulate or emigrate from the lung in parabiosis experiments, were protected from in vivo Ab labeling, and expressed elevated levels of CD69 and CD11a compared with those of circulating memory populations. Importantly, influenza-specific lung-resident memory CD4 T cells served as in situ protectors to respiratory viral challenge, mediating enhanced viral clearance and survival to lethal influenza infection. By contrast, memory CD4 T cells isolated from spleen recirculated among multiple tissues without retention and failed to mediate protection to influenza infection, despite their ability to expand and migrate to the lung. Our results reveal tissue compartmentalization as a major determining factor for immune-mediated protection in a key mucosal site, important for targeting local protective responses in vaccines and immunotherapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.1102243

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TRM cells are the most recently identified subset of memory T cells, initially characterized as effector memory T cells with a preference for residing in nonlymphoid tissues.

    “Tissue-resident memory (T RM ) cells are the most recently identified subset of memory T cells, initially characterized as effector memory T cells with a preference for residing in nonlymphoid tissues. 287-289”

    From Autoimmune Myocarditis, Old Dogs and New Tricks. (2024) · cites this paper as [289]

    The Results and Discussion section describes lung-resident memory CD4 T cells with an effector-memory phenotype and shows that they preferentially home to and remain in lung tissue. The paper calls them a new class, but our copy does not establish that tissue-resident memory cells were the most recently identified memory T-cell subset or that they were initially characterized in the way claimed. Page numbers are not provided in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Trm have been defined as independent populations by tissue retention in parabiosis experiments, by distinguishing transcriptional profiles, by exclusive Ag receptor repertoires and specificities, and by exclusive persistence in transplanted tissues.

    “They have been defined as independent populations by tissue retention in parabiosis experiments [239, 240], by distinguishing transcriptional profiles [230, 241-245], by exclusive Ag receptor repertoires and specificities [243, 244, 246], and by exclusive persistence in transplanted tissues [247, 248].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 641

Authors
Teijaro, J. R., Turner, D., Pham, Q., Wherry, E. J., Lefrançois, L., & Farber, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • UConn Health (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD 21201
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
187
Issue
11
Pages
5510-5514
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2155051381
Cited by
641
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 16
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI41576, U19AI083022, AI76457, R01AI076457, AI 083022, R01AI041576)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
tissue-resident memory T cells, respiratory viral infections, influenza, tissue tropism, tissue retention, CD69, CD11a, mucosal immunity, T cell compartmentalization, viral clearance, parabiosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Separation, Chemotaxis, Leukocyte, Flow Cytometry, Immunologic Memory, Lung, Mice, Transgenic, Orthomyxoviridae, Orthomyxoviridae Infections, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Immunity, Mucosal, Respiratory Mucosa, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review