IL-1β–Dependent Activation of Dendritic Epidermal T Cells in Contact Hypersensitivity
Open accessAbstract
Substances that penetrate the skin surface can act as allergens and induce a T cell–mediated inflammatory skin disease called contact hypersensitivity (CHS). IL-17 is a key cytokine in CHS and was originally thought to be produced solely by CD4+ T cells. However, it is now known that several cell types, including γδ T cells, can produce IL-17. In this study, we determine the role of γδ T cells, especially dendritic epidermal T cells (DETCs), in CHS. Using a well-established model for CHS in which 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) is used as allergen, we found that γδ T cells are important players in CHS. Thus, more IL-17–producing DETCs appear in the skin following exposure to DNFB in wild-type mice, and DNFB-induced ear swelling is reduced by ∼50% in TCRδ−/− mice compared with wild-type mice. In accordance, DNFB-induced ear swelling was reduced by ∼50% in IL-17−/− mice. We show that DNFB triggers DETC activation and IL-1β production in the skin and that keratinocytes produce IL-1β when stimulated with DNFB. We find that DETCs activated in vitro by incubation with anti-CD3 and IL-1β produce IL-17. Importantly, we demonstrate that the IL-1R antagonist anakinra significantly reduces CHS responses, as measured by decreased ear swelling, inhibition of local DETC activation, and a reduction in the number of IL-17+ γδ T cells and DETCs in the draining lymph nodes. Taken together, we show that DETCs become activated and produce IL-17 in an IL-1β–dependent manner during CHS, suggesting a key role for DETCs in CHS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Suction blister wounds, where the blister roof is still intact, do not show substantial inflammation, whereas excisional wounds, ultraviolet-induced skin damage, superficial tape stripping or chemical skin irritants, and contact sensitizers cause inflammatory infiltrates.
“Interestingly, suction blister wounds, where the blister roof is still intact, do not show substantial inflammation,9 whereas excisional wounds, ultraviolet (UV)-induced skin damage, superficial tape stripping or chemical skin irritants, and contact sensitizers cause inflammatory infiltrates,17,23–26”
From The Innate Immune System in Acute and Chronic Wounds (2016) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Nielsen, M. M., Lovato, P., MacLeod, A. S., Witherden, D. A., Skov, L., Dyring-Andersen, B., Dabelsteen, S., Woetmann, A., Ødum, N., Havran, W. L., Geisler, C., & Bonefeld, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Leo Pharma (Denmark) (DK)
- Scripps Research Institute (US)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Department of International Health, Immunology, and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , DK-2200 Copenhagen,
- Corresponding author
- Woetmann, Anders
- Geisler, Carsten
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-04-01
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2975-2983
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- PMC
- PMC4020443
- OpenAlex
- W2112216468
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
- Lundbeckfonden
- Novo Nordisk
- A.P. Møller og Hustru Chastine Mc-Kinney Møllers Fond til almene Formaal
- Kongelig Hofbuntmager Aage Bangs Fond
- LEO Pharma Research Foundation
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF12OC0002036)
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- LEO Pharma
- National Institutes of Health
- Medical Research Council
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 36964, T32AI007244, T32AI004244, R01AI036964, R01AI064811, AI64811)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
- Keywords
- contact hypersensitivity, dendritic epidermal T cells, IL-1β, IL-17, γδ T cells, 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene, keratinocytes, anakinra, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, ear swelling, skin inflammation, T cell activation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Line, Dermatitis, Contact, Dinitrofluorobenzene, Flow Cytometry, Langerhans Cells, Lymphocyte Activation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Skin, T-Lymphocytes, Keratinocytes, Gene Expression, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta, Mice, Knockout, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Interleukin-17, Interleukin-1beta, Mice, 129 Strain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review